DISGRACEFUL: New Reports About Those Seven ‘Civilians’ Obama Swapped With Iran

Published on April 24, 2017

And you thought the Bergdahl swap was a bad deal? This is even worse.

We keep learning more and more things about Obama’s disgraceful Iran deal that make it even worse than we had previously thought.

Right! It’s a lot like that.

Until we realize we had STILL underestimated just HOW badly Obama could blow it.

This report takes his blundering (deliberate sabotage?) to a whole NEW level.

You will remember that we delivered a planeload of foreign cash to ransom those American prisoners? — But don’t call it ransom.

We also gave them some prisoners. (More than they gave us.)

And our prisoners were actually considered a risk to national security. (Is that a big deal?)

When President Barack Obama announced the “one-time gesture” of releasing Iranian-born prisoners who “were not charged with terrorism or any violent offenses” last year, his administration presented the move as a modest trade-off for the greater good of the Iran nuclear agreement and Tehran’s pledge to free five Americans.

But Obama, the senior official and other administration representatives weren’t telling the whole story on Jan. 17, 2016, in their highly choreographed rollout of the prisoner swap and simultaneous implementation of the six-party nuclear deal, according to a POLITICO investigation.

In his Sunday morning address to the American people, Obama portrayed the seven men he freed as “civilians.” The senior official described them as businessmen convicted of or awaiting trial for mere “sanctions-related offenses, violations of the trade embargo.”

In reality, some of them were accused by Obama’s own Justice Department of posing threats to national security. Three allegedly were part of an illegal procurement network supplying Iran with U.S.-made microelectronics with applications in surface-to-air and cruise missiles like the kind Tehran test-fired recently, prompting a still-escalating exchange of threats with the Trump administration. Another was serving an eight-year sentence for conspiring to supply Iran with satellite technology and hardware. As part of the deal, U.S. officials even dropped their demand for $10 million that a jury said the aerospace engineer illegally received from Tehran.

And in a series of unpublicized court filings, the Justice Department dropped charges and international arrest warrants against 14 other men, all of them fugitives. The administration didn’t disclose their names or what they were accused of doing, noting only in an unattributed, 152-word statement about the swap that the U.S. “also removed any Interpol red notices and dismissed any charges against 14 Iranians for whom it was assessed that extradition requests were unlikely to be successful.”

…And as far back as the fall of 2014, Obama administration officials began slow-walking some significant investigations and prosecutions of Iranian procurement networks operating in the U.S. These previously undisclosed findings are based on interviews with key participants at all levels of government and an extensive review of court records and other documents.

“Clearly, there was an embargo on any Iranian cases,” according to the former federal supervisor.

“Of course it pissed people off, but it’s more significant that these guys were freed, and that people were killed because of the actions of one of them,” the supervisor added, in reference to Ravan and the IED network.

…But Lincy, who closely tracks the U.S. counterproliferation effort against Iran, said that by letting so many men off the hook, and for such a wide range of offenses, Washington has effectively given its blessing to Iran’s continuing defiance of international laws.

(Read the damming report in its entirety at Politico)

Whatever Obama may have PORTRAYED himself as being…

…it didn’t line up with what he was ACTUALLY doing.

How’s THAT for the ‘most transparent administration ever’?

Share if stories like THIS should have been reported by the ‘big’ networks.