For someone to ‘assassinate’ character, must they not first have some in the first place?
The New York Times — once a storied newspaper, is now reduced to this?
It’s sad, really.
In a New York Times op-ed published Friday, a liberal journalist and film critic complained the new film Chappaquiddick was a “character assassination” of its central character, Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy.
“How ‘Chappaquiddick’ Distorts a Tragedy” wrote Neal Gabler, who is working on a biography of Kennedy.
Gabler complained the film, released in theaters Friday, has been “heavily promoted by conservative media outlets, and reviewers across the political spectrum have praised what they deem its damning but factual approach. Damning it is; factual it is not.”
There actually was no “cover-up” of Kennedy’s car accident that led to the death of an aide, he claims, adding that “no one but the most lunatic conspiracy theorists see this as anything but a tragic accident in which nothing much was covered up.”
Source: Free Beacon
Did you notice he was “working on a biography of Kennedy”? Do you suppose that a damning story like Chappaquiddick could hurt his book sales? Or is he worried that it will make the biographer look more like a flunkie than a historian?
Here’s some of the feedback.
Real men don't leave their dates to drown in a locked car. https://t.co/WbrHkQFWZs
— Emily Zanotti (@emzanotti) April 7, 2018
The tragedy of a life without consequences ? He was responsible for the death of a young woman, walking away from both her drawing and any responsibility. The Lion of the Senate was, in fact, the Cowardly Lion.
— dantully (@dantully) April 7, 2018
I love how you reduce the death by suffocation due to callous disregard as “Tawdry Melodrama” pic.twitter.com/fRAL7ipcTI
— Ruby Tuesday (@_LovingCup) April 7, 2018
I'm looking forward to Gabler's "even-handed" love letter to the Kennedys.
— Robert Little (@inlanddefense) April 7, 2018
You make it sound as if Kennedy were alive today he could sue those responsible for the movie. Can you sue someone for "definition of character"?
— Waldo Morgan (@WWmorgan42) April 8, 2018
— Jacki Vinson (@jackivinson) April 6, 2018
Seriously? A misogynist, guilty of manslaughter for which he was never charged, but he’s of your tribe, so you double down. You have no shame.
— Robert Steckel (@ras743) April 7, 2018
Let’s pretend for a minute that the driver of that car had the last name ‘Bush’, or ‘Reagan’ or ‘Trump’.
Would he be defending the ‘character’ then?
Of course not.
They’d break out the torches and pitchforks.
But this is different. He’s a Kennedy.
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male
What makes America so different from other nations? Other nations are built around regimes or systems. But America was built from on ideas. From a blank slate.
Built on ideas that are DANGEROUS to tyrants.
That we have God-Given Rights, like Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Dangerous ideas. Like this one: the people, when threatened, have a God-Given right to stand up in defiance of any government that dares threaten any of those rights.
There’s a men’s version…
And a women’s version, too…
Because in America, the bros AND the ladies BOTH have a rich history of badass rowdiness.