It’s the kind of statement that tells you exactly who these people are… EVERYTHING is seen through the view of achieving political power.
And they claim to be the ‘compassionate’ party? Seriously?
Maybe the best explanation for their towering achievements in setting the bar for stupidity to dizzying new hights is that the Cuomos actually share a brain. And maybe most of their more infamous quotes are made when a different Cuomo has custody of it.
Presented as evidence in support of this theory is the latest stupid Cuomo statement.
Chris Cuomo heard the President speak about the Mollie Tibbetts murder.
After paying lip service to acknowledge that she was, indeed, killed by an illegal alien, as have many others and that yes, it is true that she would be alive today if he had not bypassed our border enforcement, he channeled his inner Chuck Schumer.
In so doing, he drew exactly the wrong conclusion. Here is his statement:
“Demonizing people because of their decision to take a shortcut and get here the easy way. And that is what causes illegal entrants most of the time. I wonder if these sympathizers would be as full throated about these tragedies if the killers were white citizens, if the victims were not young white women. If that were the case, would we see a video like this from Trump today?”
[he then played the video Trump tweeted with his statements] “Permanently separated. It’s as obvious as it is offensive. So he cares about Mollie Tibbetts more than people who don’t believe in separating kids from parents? Or treating undocumented immigrants like dogs? Please.”
Source: Daily Caller
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 22, 2018
“Permanently separated” is obvious to you Cuomo? We weren’t sure if it would be. You are pretty thick, after all. It’s good to see that even you could see when your own language condemns the heartlessness of your own policy. She’s dead. It was preventable. And her murderer came here from Mexico — a country that was , according to NPR, ranked #2 in the world for the dubious distinction of “most murders”. And that was before those 2017 figures were revised upward to the most murders they’ve ever had. (Citation: CNN)
What’s offensive is not just that Mollie was murdered by an illegal alien. It’s that people like Cuomo, who will live in their little gated communities and have seven-or-eight-figure salaries will never be the one to pay a personal price for the gamble they’re making with public safety.
What’s most offensive is not that they are calling US racist — as wrong as they are there — it’s that they are doing it to hide their OWN racist attitudes.
After all, it was HIS party (The Democrats) who stubbornly sat on their hands when the BLACK parents of two young teenage girls ruthlessly slaughtered by a gang with bats and machetes. Their killers were MS-13 affiliated Illegal aliens. The Democrats would sooner offend the parents by not acknowleging what they went through than do something that might possibly be understood as even minimal support for the duly-elected President at his State Of The Union. It was NOT their only such display in that farce.
Rather than assume WE are the racists, and ask whether we would care if the victim were NOT white, you should ask why their national story suddenly stopped being interesting the minute her killer was named?
And ask yourself whether the REAL racists leveraging race to force policy might be your team.
Or have you forgotten that leaked Podesta email, where we saw a rare moment of Liberal Candor:
The emails were part of a trove of messages stolen from the gmail account of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, who has had a long association with the Democratic presidential nominee and her husband, former President Bill Clinton. The email chain began on Dec. 2, when digital operative Matt Ortega forwarded a tweet from MSNBC host Christopher Hayes that named one of the shooters in the San Bernardino, Calif., attack as Sayeed Farook. Consultant Karen Finney forwarded the email to Podesta, commenting, “Damn.”
Podesta responded: “Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk [sic] was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.”
Why is a murderous white guy preferable to a murderous guy with a name like Syed?
Is it because ONE suits reality as you would LIKE it to be, one advantageous to your political messaging, rather than dealing with raw reality however we happen to find it?