Whoopi “Polanski Apologist” Goldberg Just Called Trump’s Grandson A Potential Predator… On His 7th Birthday
It’s not easy for Whoopi Goldberg to dig herself a new low, but she did it. How do you get worse than defending child molester, Polanski? By defaming a kid on TV.
Happy seventh birthday!
Whoopi has no principles to stand on. She has only her party. Here’s proof.
She is part of the pile-on against Judge Kavanaugh. Ford has spoken, and it may as well have proceeded from the mouth of God himself. The judge — whatever the lack of ANY evidence to substantiate Ford’s claims — is guilty as sin in her eyes.
If a Republican does anything, it must be interpreted in the worst possible light. If a Demcorat does anything dubious, there’s a damn good reason they did it.
When Polanski was awaiting sentencing for sexually assaulting a 13-year-old kid, he fled the country. It’s a dark chapter in MeToo that the Left does their best to sweep under the rug, because they STILL hold him up as a hero, much like they did Weinstein until they couldn’t cover up his sins anymore.
Roman Polanski was tried, convicted and awaited sentencing for what he did to a 13-year-old girl. Whoopi infamously said ‘It’s not rape-rape’. This is the same Whoopi who tore into Roy Moore for doing far less with someone much older.
Clearly, it’s politics, not principle that is of interest to these people. If Polanski were a Republican, she’d be calling for his head on a pike.
Whoopi also implied that Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Willey willingly slept with a married man, and not victims of assault.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Xp92R7S2kE
Donald Trump Jr. was asked — as a father — about his reaction to the Kavanaugh hearings:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk1vcloR_SI&feature=youtu.be
As a father of both a son and daughter, he’s concerned about the future that’s in store for both.
He was pressed on who he was more concerned about.
(Hint: the ‘right’ answer he was supposed to give was ‘his daughter’. How DARE he!)
In light of the Kavanaugh hearing, and the disgusting ritual destruction of a man who had impeccable character, he said he was more concerned about his son.
The usual sock puppets in the view went straight into ‘outrage’ mode… collateral damage be damned.
Whoopi Goldberg criticized Donald Trump Jr. Thursday on “The View,” saying that if he was concerned about his sons, he must think they are likely to assault someone. “You only worry about this for your child if you think your child has these tendencies,” she claimed. — Daily Caller
She couldn’t possibly fathom that living in a world where having unproven accusations being enough to destroy a reputation or career would be in any way a ‘bad thing’.
The only valid reason for Whoopi to mention his son in public would to be to say ‘happy birthday Tristan’.
Happy 7th Birthday to my little man Tristan. I’m so proud of all you are becoming and can’t wait to see what’s in store for you in the future. #birthday #birthdayboy #happybirthday @… https://t.co/n0bkOwThYr
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) October 2, 2018
[You probably don’t want to see what the Left did with those birthday greetings on twitter.]Happy 7th birthday to Tristan, a very special member of the Trump family!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2018
There was more. Of course there was.
“If you think your child is not someone who is assaulting people, it shouldn’t be a concern for you,” Goldberg continued.
Abby Huntsman jumped in then, defending Trump Jr.’s position by pointing out that, sometimes, innocent men are falsely accused.
“Not necessarily though, right?” Huntsman asked. “Isn’t that the point — in a not tactful way — he was trying to make? And I think [what] a lot of people are concerned about today is: you could be accused when you have been raised the right way — when you did nothing in that situation. We have countless … examples where that has happened.”
“Like who?” Joy Behar asked.
Hunstman responded immediately with, “Like the Duke lacrosse players, for example.”
Behar shrugged, “That’s one.”
— Daily Caller
Oh, she’s skeptical, and needed MORE examples? How convenient.
That’s fine, happy to help her out.
You could start by asking Rolling Stone about that lawsuit they lost. You could ask about the bogus story — so similar to the ones being told about Kavanaugh — that landed Nikki Yovino in prison.
She later admitted that she made the charges up so her evident promiscuity wouldn’t alienate a potential boyfriend.
Source: New York Post
How about the 4 accused dentists that were vindicated by video footage?
Prosecutors dropped charges Monday against four California dentists, including three brothers, who defense attorneys said were falsely accused of raping a woman at a Las Vegas Strip hotel.
“After review of the facts of the case, it was clear that the allegations were completely fabricated,” lawyers for the men wrote in a prepared statement before a court appearance. “The evidence confirmed the men’s innocence, and the state has cleared them of all charges.”
[…] Badkoobehi’s attorneys Robert Draskovich and Michael Horvath said video showed that the allegations were false and the sex was consensual.
Source: Review Journal
The dentists had something pretty important to say about their ordeal.
“We are so grateful to the justice system for recognizing that we were the victims in this case,” the statement said. “We knew when the facts came out that the vicious allegations would be exposed as lies and our good names would be cleared. At this sensitive moment in our history, we believe that women should be respected and heard and believed. But as this case shows, it is also important to keep a critical eye on those willing to use the movement for their own selfish motives and remember that innocent until proven guilty is one of our country’s bedrock principles.”
Source: Review Journal
Let’s circle back to the Kavanaugh case, where Whoopi herself has already assumed his guilt.
The accuser who said something happened on a boat in Rhode Island may now be facing charges.
Swetnick is not just being dismissed as unserious, but she has a sizeable history of sketchy lawsuits under her belt.
Accuser two herself took six days to convince herself that it really was Kavanaugh that exposed himself at a party when she was significantly impaired with alcohol.
And some serious holes have shown up in Ford’s accusations against Kavanaugh.
There is a REASON the default position we have on claims made against a person’s integrity is skepticism. You’d think that Hollywood, whose has ‘Macarthyism’ as one of their all-time favorite insults, and who love to smear Religious people by citing the Spanish Inquisition and Salem — might be able to grasp that.
Then again, do we really believe intelligence is an important hiring criterion over there at the View?
Keep cackling, harpies. the rest of us realize that the presumption of innocence is an important thing to stand up for.