This is going to seriously hurt Hillary’s ‘champion of Democracy’ narrative.
We’ve always known that the Steele Dossier was sketchy stuff, much of it bogus. We already know it was discredited. We understood — or thought we did — that it was ‘opposition research’ gathered to help her in the campaign.
What if the plan had always been use the bogus information to sink Trump AFTER the ‘unlikely event’ of him winning?
That puts EVERYTHING in a different light.
The FISA warrants for which — by the admission of agents — the Dossier was a critical piece of evidence. The collusion allegations. The accusations of obstruction leading to the Mueller investigation itself. The Dossier was the common denominator.
Conservatives have been raising hell that Opposition research could be used in such a manipulative and destructive way. But what if it wasn’t intended as ‘oppo research’? What if it was designed to deliberately sabotage the Trump Presidency, Hillary’s lapdog Media(D), together with some Swamp-rat political insiders and the Democrat lemmings have all been strung along in the willful destruction of a duly-elected President whose chief sin was that he defeated a Clinton?
British ex-spy Christopher Steele, who wrote the Democrat-financed anti-Trump dossier, said in a court case that he was hired by a Democratic law firm in preparation for Hillary Clinton challenging the results of the 2016 presidential election.
He said the law firm Perkins Coie wanted to be in a position to contest the results based on evidence he unearthed on the Trump campaign conspiring with Moscow on election interference.
His scenario is contained in a sealed Aug. 2 declaration in a defamation law suit brought by three Russian bankers in London. The trio’s American attorneys filed his answers Tuesday in a libel lawsuit in Washington against the investigative firm Fusion GPS, which handled the former British intelligence officer.
He explicitly went on to claim that Perkins Coie (Clinton’s law firm) was the immediate client of Fusion GPS. Even before Election Day, lawyers were exploring ways to legally challenge the outcome, based on their information.
“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.”
This is, we might remind you, the very same woman who stood up and wagged her finger at Trump and lectured us all about Democracy ‘smooth transitions of power’.
Ironically, the information in that dossier was not acquired first-hand, but (according to Bruce Ohr) was acquired by way of … Russian Intel.
Trump’s been calling it a ‘witch-hunt’.
Could it be that he’s been underselling it? Could this really be an attempted coup?
By the way, since Facebook has unpublished ClashDaily’s page, your best bet to keep in the loop is to Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
We’re also moving onto a new platform, MeWe. It’s like Facebook without the data breaches and censorship.
Sign up and you can still get all the ClashDaily goodness by joining our MeWe group.
Do you love what we’re doing at Clash?
Do you want to kick in to our ‘war chest’ so that we Happy Warriors can maximize the size of the footprint we leave on Leftism’s backside? Here’s a link for ya to do just that.