In the aftermath of the attack on a couple of mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern put on a hijab and asked all of her fellow New Zealanders to do the same in a show of solidarity with the nation’s Muslim population.
But she did not stop there.
She also ordered the national broadcast of Friday’s Muslim call to prayer (as well as a moment of silence) on television, radio, and in government buildings. I guess all television and radio stations in New Zealand are owned or controlled by the government.
And if that was not enough, she then decided to push for a series of gun control measures, including asking the people of New Zealand to turn in their guns. So far only 37 guns have been turned in.
Such a knee-jerk reaction to the attacks (which were carried out by an eco-terrorist who praised Communist China despite its poor environmental record) has been praised by various liberals here in America, including New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who tweeted the following remark:
“Christchurch happened, and within days New Zealand acted to get weapons of war out of the consumer market. This is what leadership looks like.”
Such views were echoed by Nicholas Kristoff of the New York Times in his column “New Zealand Shows the U.S. What Leadership Looks Like.”
Apparently, AOC and Kristoff are unaware that such measures are aspects of a dictatorship and thus not good leadership.
Meanwhile, Sweden has been under siege for over a decade due to its increasing Muslim population. Various cities, e.g. Malmo, have been experiencing an increase in rapes and other violent crimes. Even police officers and paramedics have been attacked whenever they enter Muslim neighborhoods, a.k.a. no-go zones. In addition, Muslim immigrants have put a huge strain on the economy by taking advantage of its welfare system.
This is what happens when a nation embraces a socialist welfare economy as well as multiculturalism/political correctness.
Despite the havoc Muslims have caused, the Swedes have decided to give asylum to the Uighur Muslims living in China, who are being forced to assimilate by means of education camps (including being forced to eat pork). The number of Uighur Muslims in China is said to be 10-11 million, and some of them are said to be committed to the concept of jihad.
Should Sweden (with a population of around ten million) take in all of the Uyghur Muslims, then its population will double. And since Muslims are said to make up around 8% of Sweden’s population, the result will be Sweden becoming a Muslim-majority nation, which in turn will result in more rapes, murders, assaults, etc. Hence, it will be the end of Sweden.
In conclusion, I would like to point something out: conservatives in the West who refuse to submit to the leftist/politically correct/multiculturalist agenda are all that stands between freedom and Islamization.