Biden’s Son wasn’t the only person who stood to benefit from the firing he demanded. There’s a SOROS angle there, too.
Rudy Giuliani has been wanting someone to take an interest in this story for a very long time.
How ironic that his on-air fight with Fredo Cuomo is what it finally took to get us talking about it.
Here’s ‘America’s Mayor’ explaining why we should care about what Biden was up to in demanding that particular prosecutor be fired — and replaced by someone they liked better.
Rudy Giuliani just set off a nuclear bomb. pic.twitter.com/vF0fjpmDSH
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 23, 2019
John Solomon from the Hill dug deeper and gave even greater insight to this story:
While the 2016 presidential race was raging in America, Ukrainian prosecutors ran into some unexpectedly strong headwinds as they pursued an investigation into the activities of a nonprofit in their homeland known as the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC).
The focus on AntAC — whose youthful street activists famously wore “Ukraine F*&k Corruption” T-shirts — was part of a larger probe by Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office into whether $4.4 million in U.S. funds to fight corruption inside the former Soviet republic had been improperly diverted.
The prosecutors soon would learn the resistance they faced was blowing directly from the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, where the Obama administration took the rare step of trying to press the Ukrainian government to back off its investigation of both the U.S. aid and the group.
Source: “>The Hill
What do we know about this AntAC group?
A few months later, Yuri Lutsenko, widely regarded as a hero in the West for spending two years in prison after fighting Russian aggression in his country, was named prosecutor general and invited to meet new U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.
Lutsenko told me he was stunned when the ambassador “gave me a list of people whom we should not prosecute.” The list included a founder of the AntAC group and two members of Parliament who vocally supported the group’s anti-corruption reform agenda, according to a source directly familiar with the meeting.
It turns out the group that Ukrainian law enforcement was probing was co-funded by the Obama administration and liberal mega-donor George Soros. And it was collaborating with the FBI agents investigating then-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort’s business activities with pro-Russian figures in Ukraine.
The implied message to Ukraine’s prosecutors was clear: Don’t target AntAC in the middle of an America presidential election in which Soros was backing Hillary Clinton to succeed another Soros favorite, Barack Obama, Ukrainian officials said.
Source: “>The Hill
And it isn’t as though this information exists in a vacuum, either.
Long before the word ‘collusion’ was kicked around D.C. like a skinny kid in a mosh pit, Politico wrote THIS story about Ukraine and Collusion.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
So, while Manafort tried and failed to establish proof of collusion between a foreign power (Russia) and Trump, lowly Politico was able to provide specific evidence that Hillary had done exactly that in Ukraine… and was quickly backpedaling after the fact.
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.
…Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
Revelations about Ukraine’s anti-Trump efforts could further set back those efforts.
Somehow, Manafort’s partner Tony Podesta managed NOT to get roped into Mueller’s collusion witchhunt.
Clinton-connected lobbyist Tony Podesta knew he was working with Paul Manafort on behalf of a Ukrainian politician, according to an indictment released Friday by the special counsel’s office. — DailyCaller
And in a story we told about the Clinton lawyer that Michael Cohen secured while denouncing the President:
In the same article, Gregory mentions that there is little Media (D) scrutiny on the John and Tony Podesta’s connections to Sberbank, Uranium One, the Clinton Foundation, the Hillary-led State Department, and of course those Putin-connected players, Viktor Yanukovich and Dmitry Firtash.
If Tony Podesta’s name sounds familiar, that’s because Special Counsel Robert Mueller recently granted him immunity in order to have him testify against Paul Manafort.
It seems that the ‘Russian Collusion’ investigation is going on swimmingly with that move.
Biden can say there’s ‘no fire’ all he wants. But it was his own party that made a great show of saying that where there’s a lot of smoke, we are all morally obligated to investigate the source of that smoke… remember?
And with all the connections turning up between members of the last administration and potentially inappropriate conduct, we are grateful to Fredo for throwing a spotlight on a conversation that has been too long in coming.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!