Does this answer mean that Pocahontas is sexist? Maybe.
Preachy Pete seems to be influencing his Democrat opponents — several are lecturing religious voters.
Beto O’Rourke says that churches and all religious organizations including colleges and universities need to agree with same-sex marriage or have their tax-exempt status revoked.
Senator Elizabeth Warren(D-MA) said something much more personal and directed her attack at men specifically.
At the CNN Town Hall event focusing on LGBTQ+ issues, Morgan Cox, Chair of the Human Rights Campaign’s Board of Directors, asked a question to Warren and her response was decidedly sexist.
Cox asked, “Let’s say you’re on the campaign trail and a supporter approaches you and says, ‘Senator, I’m old-fashioned, and my faith teaches me that marriage is between one man and one woman.’ What is your response?”
Warren made a joke out of it. She responded that she “assumes” that the person asking her that question is a guy (implying that no women of faith believe in the traditional definition of marriage) and says, “then just marry one woman” the crowd roars and she adds, “assuming you can find one.”
It’s interesting to watch the “woke” leftist crowd laugh as Warren just assumed a fictional voter’s gender, which is probably illegal in Canada.
Obviously it’s only those damned men that would stand for the traditional definition of marriage, right? All women obviously think the same way that leftist nutters Alyssa Milano, Rashida Tlaib, and Joy Behar do.
And if men did hold those traditional views, they should prepare to be incels because no woman would have them.
I’m not so sure about that, Liz.
Chris Cuomo followed up asking if she had ever had a different view of same-sex marriage because of her conservative background. Warren, who is now 70, was a Republican for many years, yet she says that she doesn’t remember not being pro-gay marriage in her life.
Watch Lieawatha pander to the LGBTQ+ crowd:
Elizabeth Warren was asked how she would respond to a person who says that marriage is "between one man and one woman"
— CNN (@CNN) October 11, 2019
She’s so disingenuous.
Warren, just like Beto and Preachy Pete, wants to pick and choose which things in the Bible are acceptable and which aren’t based on modern sensibilities. They don’t accept that there are timeless truths contained therein.
But she wasn’t finished bashing believers, she opened up her criticism beyond just men of faith to include everyone.
She said, “The hatefulness, frankly, always really shocked me. Especially for people of faith because I think the foundation is the worth of every single human being. And I get people may make decisions for themselves that are different than the decisions other people make, but by golly, those are decisions about you; they are not decisions that tell other people what they can and cannot do.”
Is she calling people of faith hypocrites?
The woman that wants to federally fund abortion, healthcare, college tuition, and supports illegal border crossing?
That woman is calling people of faith hypocrites?
If she’s confused about what Jesus would say about the issues, there’s a book for that!
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
By the way, since Facebook has unpublished ClashDaily’s page, your best bet to keep in the loop is to Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
But, you know us here at Clash, we don’t give up that easily. We’ve set up an outpost behind enemy lines. If you’re still on Facebook, check out our brand new ClashBriefing page.
We’ve also moved to a new social media platform, MeWe. It’s like Facebook without the data breaches and censorship.
Sign up and you can still get all the ClashDaily goodness by joining our MeWe group.