That lawyer who’s working with the supposed whistleblower in the effort to impeach Trump forgot to scrub his Social Media history.
Trump is NOT pulling his punches with these swamp critters.
Not. At. ALL.
And now that it’s become known that he had specific plans to prevent Trump from completing his first Term as President right from the beginning, it adds weight to Trump’s allegations that these allegations against him were fabricated as part of a deliberate conspiracy to remove him.
It sure would explain all those suspicious connections between the whistleblower and Shifty’s staffers… and the trips his staffers took to Ukraine before anyone had seen the official complaint. A trip funded by people with a connection to… Burisma. And you can throw in the tweet Schiff wrote about this very topic before the complaint went public for good measure.
But there’s nothing at all suspicious about any of this… right?
Ok. Then it shouldn’t be hard to explain what he was doing here in 2017. Did the amazing Kreskin here know that Trump would one day have a conversation with an as-yet not elected President in Ukraine?
Does this count as ‘motive’?
BREAKING: Whistleblower lawyer Zaid talked about “impeachment” & “coup” against Trump in Jan 2017, week after inauguration & firing of Yates. Speaks to his motive in repping whistleblower. Clearly goes beyond wanting to protect a whistleblower. Yet Zaid claimed has no pol agenda!
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 7, 2019
One week after what now? Does he not understand what ‘at the pleasure of the President’ means? But the Obama holdovers will get their revenge.
And here he is invoking an interesting term Coup, eh?
Sounds conspiratorial. Tell us more, why don’t you?
This is the attorney for the whistle blower, circa 2017. https://t.co/UmnkMaHpWH
— Ian McKelvey (@ian_mckelvey) November 7, 2019
Trump made the lawyer famous in a way that only Trump can.
.@realDonaldTrump is reading whistleblower lawyer's tweets pic.twitter.com/C90i7sNap7
— Wojciech Pawelczyk (@WojPawelczyk) November 7, 2019
So, people did digging in his OTHER public records. What kind of a grown man looks at — and ‘likes’ — videos of female Disney actresses from the time they were still kids?
Check out the Whistleblower’s Attorney, @MarkSZaidEsq’s “Liked Videos” history on YouTube.
Pretty interesting. pic.twitter.com/GpcI2LaHrl
— ALX 🎃 (@alx) November 7, 2019
Does he realize how creepy that looks? It wasn’t just one, either.
We do find it interesting that he accurately predicted — all the way back in 2017 — how complicit CNN would be in their concerted efforts to knock off Trump.
It’s almost as though he knew about those 9 am Jeff Zucker anti-Trump staff meetings that Project Veritas managed to uncover.
What ELSE should we know about this so-called whistleblower. Are there any other conflicts of interest we ought to know about?
After all, conflicts-of-interest and motive ARE some of the things that get evaluated in ACTUAL whistle-blower situations. What makes this one so special?
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
