Hunter Paternity Case Alleges Criminal Investigations For Fraud, Money Laundering, & Counterfeiting
The plot just thickened for the case against Hunter Biden — and yes… Burisma plays a part in the allegations.
Hunter just couldn’t keep it in his pants. Nor was he smart enough or savvy enough to quietly make financial arrangements with his stripper baby-mama.
As a result of those two realities, this story came to light at the worst POSSIBLE time for Sleepy Joe… with Iowa just around the corner.
Is this yet more evidence that Trump was entirely justified in looking into the situation where Biden bullied Ukraine into compliance by waving around a billion-dollar aid package?
Tucker: Hunter Biden is linked to investigations for fraud, money laundering and counterfeiting pic.twitter.com/qlPekbJBL9
— Wojciech Pawelczyk (@WojPawelczyk) December 24, 2019
Are the claims real? Are they a calculated political hit orchestrated by Joe’s 2020 rival? Maybe both? Hard to say. Here are the claims being made:
One of the claims involves Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company that’s at the center of President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial. Trump came under fire for a phone call with Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, urging him to investigate Hunter’s work with Burisma, while withholding some $400million in military aid.
The new allegations accuse Hunter and business associates of establishing ‘bank and financial accounts with Morgan Stanley … for Burisma Holdings Limited … for the money laundering scheme’.
…In addition, the documents allege that Hunter and three associates attempted to con Sioux Native Americans out of $60million through the sale of tribal bonds.
It’s unclear what agencies are allegedly investigating Hunter. But shortly after the allegations were filed, a judge struck them down because they were filed by an ‘intervener,’ according to the Post. — DailyMail
It’s looking more and more like there is enough plausibility to any claims about Biden’s corruption that it really DOES bear looking into.
Funny how that is exactly the thing that Democrats are trying to skewer Trump’s presidency for, isn’t it?
Can we expect an apology from Nancy Pelosi if Trump’s explicit concerns about Joe’s claims ‘sounding bad’ turn out to be justified?
Will Democrats relent if a quid-pro-Joe is clearly proven?
Of course not. This is pure politics, nothing more.