Trying to keep all of these different voting SNAFU’s straight isn’t easy… but the voters still deserve answers anyway.
Lots of weird things have popped up in this election cycle, but the press is so devotedly committed to seeing Biden replace Trump in the White House, they dare not acknowledge any of it, lest the asking of honest questions could endanger their team’s chance at a win.
As one example, it would be good to know what the story behind this now-deleted tweet was. If legit, it sure would have an impact on these races. If not, we would like to know how these particular numbers were posted on an official site. No simple answers to that in either direction.
But even harder to come up with is an explanation for why the vote number for one of the candidates might DROP during counting.
Dropping even a little bit would be huge. But by almost six figures? That’s no simple ‘error’.
This was posted on our Department of State dashboard but had since been deleted. pic.twitter.com/bDmvCK0kDB
— Senator Doug Mastriano (@SenMastriano) November 27, 2020
Vote tabulation data in various battleground states contain “anomalies” with massive swings toward Joe Biden that suggest missing ballots for President Trump, according to data expert Justin Hart, who helped raise millions of dollars for Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign.
Trump has retweeted charts from Hart questioning vote tabulations, including retweeting Hart’s calculation showing that Trump would have had to lose votes in Pennsylvania if the real-time, individual, timed stamped entries from The New York Times were accurate. Hart said his analysis was used in a Pennsylvania legislative hearing Wednesday with numerous witnesses alleging voter fraud and voter irregularities.
“You know what’s even MORE suspicious than BIG vote dumps giving Biden the lead in WI and MI? Taking AWAY votes from @realDonaldTrump in Pennsylvania!,” Hart tweeted Nov. 20 in a tweet that Trump retweeted on Tuesday. “This chart: the 25 data dumps where Trump LOST votes from the Dominion feeds. 97,676 votes LOST! And Biden GAINED 160K+ votes!”
“There’s a lot of anomalies in that data,” Hart said in an interview with Just the News. “And then I think the real evidence though is in the pure volume, when you have a big batch that comes in at like 96%, for Biden, it’s unclear where they would find enough precincts that would have that many votes.”
While the Times released percentage changes and did not release raw vote numbers, Hart said his analysis of Pennsylvania was based on the percentage change that would have had to have occurred to have that level of swing toward Biden and away from Trump, which would yield votes lost for the president if the tally was accurate. —JustTheNews
Since this is an issue with the machine itself and not just the processes, any of those counts that lingered late into the night, only to be restarted later are deeply suspect.
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.