Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

News Clash

Should Swalwell Pay A Price For His Misconduct As House Impeachment Manager?

Become a Clash Insider!

Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.

If a prosecutor gets busted falsifying evidence in a court, he pays a price. What Swalwell tried to do was much worse. What price should he pay for it?

Not long ago, Rep Greene was formally stripped of all of her committee duties because she had — some time before being elected to public office — ascribed to and promoted some disreputable ideas.

Rep Greene, has publicly taken ownership for the fact that she had previously believed those ideas, which she now believes to be false. She has also apologized publicly for having held the related beliefs in the first place.

Eric Swalwell, on the other hand, is a trained lawyer who entered false evidence in the Senate in an effort to use the Constitutional tool of impeachment in the service of destroying a political rival.

Swalwell entered doctored evidence (that is to say, false evidence) into the public record in allegations he made against the 45th President, he wildly misrepresented the beliefs and position of the person whose tweet he manipulated and entered into the public record, and in so doing he has endangered the personal safety of the person whose tweet he misused.

We can even see a reason that might motivate him for faking that tweetas being ‘verified’.

Just the News noted that Lawrence said in an interview on “The John Solomon Reports Podcast” that “if [Swalwell] entered that into congressional testimony, it’s a verified account, and … it could be applicable in law. Secondly, he wanted to show that my Twitter account had more gravitas than it actually did. He wanted to show that the president was trying to use me to bring in the cavalry.” —TheBlaze

To use terminology he would be familiar with, his actions have incited threats of violence against the woman he misquoted.

Lawyers offering bogus evidence in a regular trial would pay a steep professional price. Should Eric Swalwell not pay any price for abusing a Constitutional impeachment process?

Let’s look back at what it was Swalwell did. Unlike Swalwell, we will let the person he claims to be citing actually give proper context and explain what it was she was really saying, rather than squeezing it into a predetermined narrative.

Here is an excerpt from Jennifer’s open letter in response to what was said about her.

Dear Senator,

Yesterday my safety and reputation came under attack during the impeachment trial because one of the Democrat House Impeachment Managers, Eric Swalwell maliciously changed both the appearance and meaning of one my Tweets during testimony on Wednesday.

Democrat persecutors have spun a conspiracy theory so absurd that the tweet displayed by Congressman Swalwell had to be altered physically by adding a verified badge and completely change the meaning by replacing a word with another similarly spelled word. Calvary is not the same thing as Cavalry no matter how much the persecutors want it to be so.

Here is the word I correctly used Calvary:

[Here she attaches a screenshot of the definition relating to the atoning Crucifixion of Jesus Christ]

…Here is the word Eric Swalwell told the world I was using cavalry:

[Here she attaches a screenshot of a definition refering to the mobile army unit, whether on horseback or in helicopter]

…I don’t do horses ok(I’m from New York). I’m not in the army either so the use of the word cavalry would have been pretty stupid. It’s a wonder Congressman Swalwell didn’t pick up on it.

Bringing the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ (AKA the salvation of everyone) back to Washington DC was EXACTLY why we organized three successful protests on November 14, December 12, and January 5th. We believe our sacred institutions have rotted through with bloat and corruption PRECISELY because they have separated the State from God. — Read the rest on Substack

In a podcast interview with John Solomon and a pastor friend of hers, she explained further. She had been part of an open-air bus tour in support of Trump. The preachers among them had also given open-air gospel presentations, and invitations to receive Christ. Her pastor friend saw the tweet and thought she had made a typo. Jennifer explained that the word choice was an intentional reference to her faith.

Notice the name of the group she was working alongside of, this post went up long before she was drawn into the conflict.

You might understand from Swalwell’s use of her tweet as evidence that she was somehow involved in the security breach of the Capitol building. Otherwise, his use of that would ring really hollow, right?

She saw the events the same way most other people did. On TV. She was nowhere near the events as they unfolded.

But her name was smeared, and she has had to hire security. Why?

Because there are activist groups that are more than happy to use violence and intimidation to achieve political ends. But we won’t seen them featured on the news, because reporting anything about THAT violent political group would advance the ‘wrong’ narrative.

Swalwell lied in the well of the Senate — which we’ve been told again and again is one of the most ‘sacred’ places in the Capitorl. He slandered people, and endangered the safety of a private citizen for personal, political gain.

Swalwell cares SO much about the wellbeing of private citizens that he mocked a woman who was threatened with rape for the ‘crime’ of having the wrong politics.

Hard to believe he can even say the word ‘incitement’ with a straight face. And he expects to go back to his life as though nothing happened, when lawywers have been disbarred for less?

He had a longstanding relationship with a honeypot spy, he’s been a House Imeachment manager busted submitting bogus evidence, and STILL the Democrats haven’t made him pay the slightest price for it.

I bet he could kill a guy in 5th Avenue in broad daylight, and (so long as it wasn’t a Democrat donor or other ‘special interest’ group), they’d still give him a pass.

The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles

Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog,, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male

Wes Walker

Wes Walker is the author of "Blueprint For a Government that Doesn't Suck". He has been lighting up since its inception in July of 2012. Follow on twitter: @Republicanuck

Related Articles