REPORT: New Study Concludes That The Coronavirus Was Created In The Wuhan Lab And China Tried To Cover It Up

Written by K. Walker on May 29, 2021

Become a Clash Insider!

Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.

The new study concludes that SARS-CoV-2 has “no credible natural ancestor” and that it is “beyond reasonable doubt” that the virus was created through “laboratory manipulation.”

It’s been a long journey for a couple of scientists who were skeptical of the prevailing scientific narrative about the origin of the coronavirus.

For about a year, British professor, Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen said that in their studies of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, they had seen what they concluded to be evidence of lab manipulation of the virus.

ClashDaily reported on Sørensen’s initial study back on June 8, 2020. 

Their new 22-page paper is set to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery.

It includes some damning evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was created in a Wuhan lab where Chinese scientists were conducting “gain of function” research into coronaviruses.

According to the paper, the scientists believe that the now-famous “spike” protein that allows the virus to enter the cell and may play a more significant role in illness than previously believed, was “spliced” onto a coronavirus “backbone” taken from a sample that had been found in Chinese bat caves.

Interestingly, China’s approved coronavirus vaccines don’t use mRNA technology. In April, Chinese scientists admitted that their vaccines are far less effective than the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines that use the mRNA process.

According to the Center for Disease Control, the mRNA vaccines “give instructions to the cells to produce a “harmless piece” of the spike protein like the one that is on the surface of the coronavirus.

It wasn’t until May that the announcement was made that a late-stage clinical trial for a Chinese-developed mRNA vaccine was going to be conducted in Mexico. Earlier this year, China had been spreading doubt about the safety of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine while they suggested that the coronavirus originated within an American military lab.

The scientists concluded that the SARS-CoV-2 virus “has no credible natural ancestor” and that Chinese scientists reverse-engineered viruses to make it look like it was a naturally occurring mutation of the virus.

The study also notes the efforts that were made by scientists in Wuhan labs to conceal information about the virus early on including “deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data” and that “scientists who wished to share their findings haven’t been able to do so or have disappeared.”

An explosive new study claims that Chinese scientists created COVID-19 in a Wuhan lab, then tried to cover their tracks by reverse-engineering versions of the virus to make it look like it evolved naturally from bats.

The paper’s authors, British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen, wrote that they have had ‘prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China‘ for a year – but were ignored by academics and major journals.

Dalgleish is a professor of oncology at St George’s University, London, and is best known for his breakthrough creating the first working ‘HIV vaccine’, to treat diagnosed patients and allow them to go off medication for months.

Sørensen, a virologist, is chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, which developed a coronavirus vaccine candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has share options in the firm.

The shocking allegations in the study include accusations of ‘deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data’ at Chinese labs, and it notes the silencing and disappearance of scientists in the communist country who spoke out.

Dalgleish and Sørensen said that last year, when they were analyzing coronavirus samples while working on developing a vaccine, they discovered “unique fingerprints” in the virus that could have only been the result of lab manipulation. When they tried publishing their findings, they were rejected by major scientific journals that had been committed to the idea that the virus originated in nature and jumped from other animals to humans.

Even when former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove publicly stated that the theory put forward by the two scientists should be investigated, but it was dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.”

The 22-page study describes Dalgleish and Sørensen’s months-long “forensic analysis”  looking at experiments done at the Wuhan lab between 2002 and 2019 which included digging through archives of journals and databases to see how Chinese scientists allegedly built the tools to create the coronavirus.

One tell-tale sign of alleged manipulation the two men highlighted was a row of four amino acids they found on the SARS-Cov-2 spike.

In an exclusive interview with, Sørensen said the amino acids all have a positive charge, which cause the virus to tightly cling to the negatively charged parts of human cells like a magnet, and so become more infectious.

But because, like magnets, the positively charged amino acids repel each other, it is rare to find even three in a row in naturally occurring organisms, while four in a row is ‘extremely unlikely,’ the scientist said.

‘The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row. The only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it,’ Dalgleish told

Their new paper says these features of SARS-Cov-2 are ‘unique fingerprints’ which are ‘indicative of purposive manipulation’, and that ‘the likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very small.’

Source: Daily Mail

Here are a couple of images of the yet-to-be-published study:

The conclusion states:

We have deduced the internal logic of published research which resulted in the exact functionalities of SARS-Coronavirus-2, including the convergence of agreement from difference classes of source, the timings of the stages of the research and the development of documented capabilities by named institutions and individuals. These meet the criteria of means, timing, agent, and place in this reconstructed historical aetiiology to produce sufficient confidence in the account to reverse the burden of proof. Furthermore, a basic biochemical expectation can be added to this. A natural virus pandemic would be expected to mutate gradually and become more infectious but less pathogenic which is what many expected with the COVID-19 pandemic but which does not appear to have happened. The purposively manipulated chimeric virus SARS-CoV-2 makes it imperative to reconsider what types of Gain of Function experiments it is morally acceptable to undertake. Because of wide social impact, these decisions cannot be left to research scientists alone.

This doesn’t mean that it’s definitive proof that the virus was man-made and leaked from the lab. This is, after all the observation of two scientists that needs peer-review, but their work has been dismissed for almost a year until the “scientific consensus” suddenly shifted to allow for the possibility of a lab leak.

So, can we call it the Wuhan virus now?



ClashDaily's Associate Editor since August 2016. Self-described political junkie, anti-Third Wave Feminist, and a nightmare to the 'intersectional' crowd. Mrs. Walker has taken a stand against 'white privilege' education in public schools. She's also an amateur Playwright, former Drama teacher, and staunch defender of the Oxford comma. Follow her humble musings on Twitter: @TheMrsKnowItAll and on Gettr @KarenWalker