NO CLEAR BENEFIT: Sweden Decides AGAINST Recommending Kids Age 5-11 Get The COVID Vaccine
Become a Clash Insider!
Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll keep you in the loop.
So… do we need to jab the kids or not?
Reuters is reporting that the health authorities in Sweden have decided against recommending that children between the ages of 5-11 get the COVID-19 vaccine.
One official said that the decision was made because children are at low risk for serious illness and the health agency didn’t see “any clear benefit” in vaccinating them.
Sweden has decided against recommending COVID vaccines for kids aged 5-11, the Health Agency said on Thursday, arguing that the benefits did not outweigh the risks.
“With the knowledge we have today, with a low risk for serious disease for kids, we don’t see any clear benefit with vaccinating them,” Health Agency official Britta Bjorkholm told a news conference.
She added that the decision could be revisited if the research changed or if a new variant changed the pandemic. Kids in high-risk groups can already get the vaccine.
Source: Reuters
Meanwhile, in the United States, Saint Fauci’s vaccine fetish has him giddy over the thought of children under age 5 getting triple-jabbed.
As vaccine timeline pushed back for kids under 5, Dr. Anthony Fauci tells @jonkarl that health officials are looking at a potential three dose vaccine for children.
“If you’re going to do that, you’re gonna need more data.” https://t.co/UiRuZirRkK pic.twitter.com/52ZAbQNfbT
— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) December 19, 2021
Fauci was lamenting the early Pfizer report in December that said that the double-jabs on the wee ones wasn’t producing enough of an immune response, so they’ve increased to three doses, which probably made the vaccine aficionado very happy.
Pfizer said Friday it was changing plans and testing three doses of its Covid-19 vaccine in babies and preschoolers instead of the usual two.
The addition of an extra dose came after a preliminary analysis found two- to four-year-olds didn’t have as strong an immune response as expected to special low-dose shots.
Pfizer had planned to release data from its study of children under five by the end of the year. It’s not clear how this change will delay the quest to vaccinate the youngest children.
Pfizer and its partner BioNTech said if the three-dose study is successful, they plan to apply for emergency authorization sometime in the first half of 2022.
Source: NBC News
Remember, Fauci is the same guy that wants kids over the age of 2 wearing mask and “hopes” that it doesn’t do long-term damage.
- WATCH: Fauci Says Children 2 And Up Should Wear Masks — But That’s Not What The WHO Recommends…
- COVIDICTATOR: Dr. Fauci Says Don’t Let Kids Play Together Without Wearing Masks (VIDEO)
- Dr. Fauci Says ‘Hopefully’ Forcing Young Children To Wear Masks Won’t Have A ‘Lasting Negative Impact’
- WATCH: Fauci Admits The Number Of Children Hospitalized With COVID Is Overblown
What an a-hole.
So, what does this mean for The Science™?
Does this mean that the Swedish Health Authority is wrong because they disagree with Saint Fauci? Are they all attacking him and Science itself because they don’t see the benefit in giving kids a vaccine for an illness that is not a serious threat to them?
Other experts say that we now know that there are risks of pericarditis in teens and young men that we didn’t know about until vaccines were widely distributed.
After the roll-out to 5-11-year-olds, there were a few cases of heart inflammation in children who received the Pfizer vaccine.
In addition, we have no long-term data on the effect of the vaccines on children’s still-developing bodies.
Meanwhile, there are other much more serious illnesses that are a bigger threat to children.
It looks like Sweden is weighing risk vs reward and found that the jabs just aren’t worth it for kids age 5-11.
So, why are countries in North America forcing vaccines and mask on kids? Because of fearful, COVID-paranoid adults who want children to protect them instead of the other way around.
It’s positively shameful.
Maybe we need a closer look at Pfizer’s data before another one of those shots goes into another child.
Of course, Pfizer isn’t exactly transparent about their data.
- Judge Smacks Down FDA’s Attempted 75 YEAR Slow-Walk Release Of Pfizer Vaccine Documents
- British Medical Journal Calls For Full And Immediate Transparency From Big Pharma And Public Health Officials
It’s time to just say NO.
Have you had it with the Prevaricating Authoritarian Smurf giving his pronouncements about the pandemic from on high? You’re not alone. Maybe it’s time to tell the diminutive bureaucrat who keeps moving the goalposts exactly what you think of him.
Which you can order here.
We’ve got the Unisex Jersey Short-Sleeve Tee…
Which you can order here.
We’ve got the Unisex Jersey Short-Sleeve V-Neck Tee…
Which you can order here.
And finally, the ‘Not Today Fauci’ Men’s Cotton Crew Tee…
Which you can order here.
