A friend of mine recently commented that the ‘social’ justice movement in America is alive and well and that great things have been happening. It then occurred to me, when you put any word in front of the word ‘justice,’ the true meaning of justice is altered.
Thomas Jefferson wrote that “The most sacred of the duties of government is to do equal and impartial justice to all its citizens.” The hallowed duty to fulfill the promise of justice for all remains — or ideally should remain — as the guiding ideal for the people we elect to government.
I asked my friend for an example of social justice and was told that power lines being installed near poor neighborhoods instead of wealthier neighborhoods was a prime example. I then explained that that was not an issue related to ‘social’ justice but to justice itself. Social justice is some group’s attempt at righting what they consider to be wrong.
Avenue for Redress
This is not 1860, or 1960. Today there are numerous avenues for illuminating any issue of merit. At the local level, there are zoning boards in every municipality, city councils usually with members on the left and the right, town hall meetings, public forums, newspapers, local television stations –- a variety of entities that can be brought to bear to examine an issue and to forge some type of equitable redress if needed.
No form of political government is anywhere near perfect or even equitable much of the time. Democracy is difficult, but all other forms of government are worse.
In a democracy, or representative republic, such as we have in the U.S., you can’t go off half-cocked and do exactly what you want because you think that a particular law is bad. You have to work to change the law, to change policies, to address inequities within the framework of democracy, and within the bounds of the justice system.
Consider the phenomenon of sanctuary cities. For a sanctuary city to exist, one has to have a mayor, city council members, an alderman, and other committee members, including those who were elected as well as appointed, to believe that what they’re espousing is right, while ignoring what has been passed into law. This ruling class thus bypasses what a majority of citizens count on each and every day.
Vigilantism isn’t Pretty
A sanctuary city, by definition, is a city that is breaking the law. The Left will rationalize that ‘social’ justice requires breaking the law and that not all laws are good laws. Granted that not all laws are good laws. Laws, however they got passed, were passed as a result of a process in vogue for tens if not hundreds of years.
If laws routinely discriminate against one segment of the population versus another, then by all means work to change the law. When you substitute or insert catchphrases into the mix, such as ‘social’ justice, what that actually means is that you have another viewpoint of an issue. Further, you deem that your view and your actions are more meritorious than whatever came before them.
Years ago, by exhibiting such behavior, you would be regarded as a vigilante. What are vigilantes? A self-appointed group of citizens who engage in policy enforcement without having legal authority, usually because they deem the legal agencies to be inadequate.
Because we dwell in a society where the media is distinctly liberal, and even leftist –- as we have witnessed with big tech and, unfortunately, a variety of government agencies -– those advocating for ‘social’ justice have the wind at their backs. Yet, they violate the rights, and votes, of half the population and perhaps much more.
We All Have Opinions
Any one of us could offer a running list of issues that we’d like to change in society. If we simply decide, willy-nilly, to start ignoring existing laws in favor of what we want to have done, how long will it take before society breaks down completely? Taking the law into your own hands is the essence of what it means to be a vigilante. Vigilante-dominated societies are not healthy. Many of the people who reside in them live in constant fear.
Taking the law into your own hands is an ill-advised shortcut, a way to seek what you want without working through the system, however imperfect the system might be. This country — any country — does not need more vigilantism.