The Twitter files COVID conspiracy drop was eagerly anticipated. This one outlines the first of what Elon promises will be several that shed light on what REALLY happened.
[Editor note: As we do with every Twitter files drop, we remind you that our ClashDaily store is what keeps our website free of paywalls. You can find a variety of collections perfect for the rowdy Patriot, owning the libs, trashing Fauci, novelties and gifts, books, and ClashDaily exclusive offers.]
But This is the one we specifically highlight with every TwitterFiles drop. And every time it becomes increasingly relevant.
Here are some of the key points to watch for as you review the thread:
#7 — Google, Facebook, Microsoft, specifically involved in government mentions.
#8 — Biden administration explicitly called for the cancellation of a doctor (Berenson) that disagreed with the official White House narrative.
#9 — Berenson was suspended hours after Biden’s public comments about vaccine misinformation, account shut down not long after that
#10 — Biden admin asking why Berenson had NOT been kicked off Twitter
#11 — Evidence of ongoing White House pressure campaign to influence Twitter
#12 — Biden admin ‘very angry’ about accounts that had NOT been deplatformed
#20 — Doctor (a Harvard Prof, no less) suspended for writing true statements that contradicted WH narratives … action was taken against his account
#25 — User cited actual CDC data and got flagged as misleading.
#29 — Doctor given strikes after citing a peer-reviewed study
#34 — Jim Baker (of FBI Crossfire Hurricane infamy) pressured Yoel Roth to censor Trump for … optimism after he had recovered from COVID… Against all reasonable expectations, Roth actually played the role of the responsible adult in that conversation.
#37 — what was really meant by ‘the science’
Elon himself says the quiet part out loud:
Elon Musk
"To be totally frank, almost every conspiracy theory that people had about Twitter turned out to be true." pic.twitter.com/zBDY3AcrRq— Gretchen 🇺🇸 (@GretchenOO8) December 25, 2022
1. THREAD:
THE TWITTER FILES: HOW TWITTER RIGGED THE COVID DEBATE
– By censoring info that was true but inconvenient to U.S. govt. policy
– By discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed
– By suppressing ordinary users, including some sharing the CDC’s *own data*— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
3. What we have yet to cover is Covid. This reporting, for The Free Press, @thefp, is one piece of that important story.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
5. Internal files at Twitter that I viewed while on assignment for @thefp showed that both the Trump and Biden administrations directly pressed Twitter executives to moderate the platform’s pandemic content according to their wishes.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
7. It wasn’t just Twitter. The meetings with the Trump White House were also attended by Google, Facebook, Microsoft and others. pic.twitter.com/OgOrRxBBBW
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
9. In the summer of 2021, president Biden said social media companies were “killing people” for allowing vaccine misinformation. Berenson was suspended hours after Biden’s comments, and kicked off the platform the following month.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
11. A December 2022 summary of meetings with the White House by Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of U.S. Public Policy, adds new evidence of the White House’s pressure campaign, and cements that it repeatedly attempted to directly influence the platform.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
13. Twitter executives did not fully capitulate to the Biden team’s wishes. An extensive review of internal communications at the company revealed employees often debating moderation cases in great detail, and with more care than was shown by the government toward free speech.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
15. There were three serious problems with Twitter’s process:
First, much of the content moderation was conducted by bots, trained on machine learning and AI – impressive in their engineering, yet still too crude for such nuanced work.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
11. A December 2022 summary of meetings with the White House by Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of U.S. Public Policy, adds new evidence of the White House’s pressure campaign, and cements that it repeatedly attempted to directly influence the platform.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
13. Twitter executives did not fully capitulate to the Biden team’s wishes. An extensive review of internal communications at the company revealed employees often debating moderation cases in great detail, and with more care than was shown by the government toward free speech.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
15. There were three serious problems with Twitter’s process:
First, much of the content moderation was conducted by bots, trained on machine learning and AI – impressive in their engineering, yet still too crude for such nuanced work.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
17 Third, most importantly, the buck stopped with higher level employees at Twitter who chose the inputs for the bots and decision trees, and subjectively decided escalated cases and suspensions. As it is with all people and institutions, there was individual and collective bias
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
19. Inevitably, dissident yet legitimate content was labeled as misinformation, and the accounts of doctors and others were suspended both for tweeting opinions and demonstrably true information.
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
21. Internal emails show an “intent to action” by a moderator, saying Kulldorff’s tweet violated the company’s Covid-19 misinformation policy and claimed he shared “false information.” pic.twitter.com/lq9QOP8h27
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
23. After Twitter took action, Kulldorff’s tweet was slapped with a “Misleading” label and all replies and likes were shut off, throttling the tweet’s ability to be seen and shared by many people, the ostensible core function of the platform: pic.twitter.com/Qa1HpaEray
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
25. A tweet by @KelleyKga, a self-proclaimed public health fact checker, with 18K followers, was flagged as “Misleading,” and replies and likes disabled, even though it displayed the CDC’s *own data.* pic.twitter.com/8ABQzYGpXf
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
27. Tellingly, the tweet by @KelleyKga that was labeled “Misleading” was a reply to a tweet that contained actual misinformation.
Covid has never been the leading cause of death from disease in children. Yet that tweet remains on the platform, and without a “misleading” label. pic.twitter.com/vK5NpWg8KT
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
29. Andrew Bostom, a Rhode Island physician, was permanently suspended from Twitter after receiving multiple strikes for misinformation. One of his strikes was for a tweet referring to the results from a peer reviewed study on mRNA vaccines. pic.twitter.com/Q65KlRwrqs
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
31. The one Bostom tweet found to still be in violation cited data that was legitimate but inconvenient to the public health establishment’s narrative about the risks of flu versus Covid in children. pic.twitter.com/KT3q7Ee9CA
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
33. Another example of human bias run amok was the reaction to this tweet by Trump. Many Trump tweets led to extensive internal debates, and this one was no different. pic.twitter.com/kQs1ADPVAk
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
35. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of Trust & Safety, had to explain that optimism wasn’t misinformation. pic.twitter.com/1pj8uvzWR1
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
37. Twitter made a decision, via the political leanings of senior staff, and govt pressure, that the public health authorities’ approach to the pandemic – prioritizing mitigation over other concerns – was “The Science” . . .
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
39. What might this pandemic and its aftermath have looked like if there had been a more open debate on Twitter and other social media platforms—not to mention the mainstream press—about the origins of Covid, about lockdowns, about the true risks of Covid in kids, and much more?
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
41. An expanded version of this thread is available now @thefp! https://t.co/3QnsdJk40j
— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022
For context:
Related:
- ‘The Twitter Files’ Exposes How The Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was Suppressed By Twitter
- ‘Twitter Files 2’ Reveals Twitter DID Shadowban And Blacklist Conservatives — Here’s The 411
- TwitterFiles Trump Edition: — Guess Which 3 Letter Agencies Featured Prominently?
- TwitterFiles 4: Top Execs Changed The Platform’s Policies Specifically To Permanently Ban Trump
- TwitterFiles 5: Staffers Couldn’t Find ‘Incitement’ But Twitter Banned Trump’s Account Anyway
- Twitter & The Feds Were The Tip Of The Iceberg … Here Are Some MORE Politicized Tech Companies (VIDEO)
- Twitter & The Feds … The ‘But WAIT, There’s MORE’ Edition
- TwitterFiles 7: FBI Paid Twitter Millions And Pressured Execs To Suppress The Hunter Biden Laptop Story
- TwitterFiles 8: Pentagon-Controlled Propaganda Accounts Placed On A Special Twitter ‘Whitelist’
Elon Smoked The Old Twitter Bird
ClashDaily’s Big Dawg has put his own spin on what’s been going down on the ol’ Bird App — the old Twitter is dead and Elon is building a new one.
Check out Doug’s latest piece, ‘Elon Smoked The Old Twitter Bird.’
Use promo code, ‘FIRST20’, for 20% off all prints. We print on luster paper, museum quality canvas, wood, and for all you metal-heads, we print on metal. We use only the finest inks. Custom sizes are available from small to couch-sized wall monsters.
