For over a year now, we’ve had people in authority putting a gun to the head of ordinary people — get the jab or else — under nothing more than the say-so of important-looking people in labcoats that it was safe.
Anyone who took even a second to step back and think about how the approval process works would immediately see the problem with that assertion.
A vaccine developed for a disease that almost nobody had heard of before January of 2020 couldn’t possibly have a body of evidence showing whether or not it was safe. Whatever even the most defensible fear-based arguments about saving lives of the most vulnerable might have been during the hight of the pandemic, the math has changed. Seeing as there is no evidence that it prevents transmission of COVID, even the most altruistic do-it-for-grandma arguments no longer hold water.
Despite all that, we still see Little Lord Fauci and his army of labcoat-sporting clones nodding sagely and telling us that this brand-new treatment option is not only safe for people but it is recommended — right down to the youngest of our children.
We have since learned that there are significant risks associated with this vaccine that they weren’t telling us about. Myocarditis is now a household name, for instance. DeSantis is opening up a grand jury investigation into what we were and were not told, and whether any fraud was involved. Fauci may be able to stonewall Congress with that smug grin on his face. But a grand jury is another story.
Among the many questions that a grand jury investigation might want to answer is one involving a FOIA that government agencies stonewalled back in September of 2021. That was when Biden’s government was not only pushing mandates on individuals but also trying to use government agencies to compel private businesses to make vaccines a requirement of employment.
Here’s what Judicial Watch found in the FOIA-requested documents that were only released after a court ordered them to do so:
Judicial Watch announced today that it received 699 pages of records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding data Moderna submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which indicate a “statistically significant” number of rats were born with skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected with the vaccine. The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals.
…The records include a “Nonclinical Overview” prepared by Moderna and submitted to the FDA for approval of its vaccine revealing that a number of rats were born with skeletal deformations, known as “wavy ribs” and “rib nodules,” to mothers injected with the mRNA vaccine. The study dismissed the anomalies as “not considered adverse:”
mRNA-1273-related variations in skeletal examination included statistically significant increases in the number of F1 rats with 1 or more wavy ribs and 1 or more rib nodules. Wavy ribs appeared in 6 fetuses and 4 litters with a fetal prevalence of 4.03% and a litter prevalence of 18.2%. Rib nodules appeared in 5 of those 6 fetuses. Skeletal variations are structural changes that do not impact development or function of a developing embryo, are considered reversible, and often correlate with maternal toxicity and/or lack of other indicators of developmental toxicity (Carney and Kimmel 2007). Maternal toxicity in the form of clinical observations was observed for 5 days following the last dose (GD 13), correlating with the most sensitive period for rib development in rats (GDs 14 to 17). Furthermore, there were no other indicators of mRNA-1273-related developmental toxicity observed, including delayed ossification; therefore, these common skeletal variations were not considered adverse.
The full report is available here. But there is something else that jumps out at even a reader with no particular familiarity in medical jargon:
In other words, we have been assured that a medical treatment we are being compelled to take ‘or else’, is ‘safe’ — despite the very mechanism for determining safety having never been applied to this treatment. (Go ahead and read the full source article for proper context. There is more in there than we can cover here.)
It sure looks like we’ve been lied to, and people have been raking in billions in the process.
The smug moralizing of our ‘betters’ in labcoats ends now. What comes next?
Groveling apologies could be a good start. From there we can figure out our next steps. Florida’s grand jury looks like a step in the right direction.
As for the protection Big Pharma had from lawsuits — they might want to check with their legal teams whether they remain shielded if investigations turn up deliberate acts of fraud.
You know… just in case.
by Doug Giles
Beginning in March 2020, many Christians went into lockdown-freak-out mode. Uncut, irrational, unbiblical, and not to mention, unconstitutional, fear gripped many churches and church leaders. Forced to choose between obeying the Word of God or the edict of man, most Western Churches buckled. We even saw it here in First Amendment-protected America.
The Apostle Peter buckled to fear on the night of Christ’s crucifixion. But he learned his lesson and lived the rest of his life bold as a lion. How can the church ‘go and do likewise’?
Read the book and find out!
Get your copy of Dear Christian: Your Fear Is Full of Crap now. Better yet, grab an extra copy for any petrified pastor who dutifully put obedience to the unconstitutional edicts of Mayor McCheese ahead of obedience to the explicit commandments of the LORD God Almighty.