[Editor’s note: our ClashDaily store helps offset operating costs so we don’t have to hide our best content behind a paywall like so many other sites have been forced to… don’t forget to browse our ‘Righteous Collection‘ of Christian-themed books and gear, including a tshirt that will put a grin on the face of Blues Brothers fans: ‘I’m on a mission from God‘.]
Gee, why do we have a growing suspicion that law enforcement would find some interesting content on this clown’s laptop?
If we’re not supposed to call these people Groomers — why are they so hellbent on pushing the age of sexual awareness to younger and younger children?
William ‘Willy’ Villapando is a California preschool teacher in the Rialto Unified School District… and a self-described ‘expert at developing a child’s gender identity’. He strongly objects to the very concept of ‘childhood innocence’.
He works at Trapp Preschool and believes it’s never too early to teach kids about ‘queerness’.
“There is a common mythology that children live in this world of pure innocence, and that by introducing or exposing them to the real-world adults are somehow shattering this illusion for them. Therefore, there is a banning of topics and issues that children should not be exposed to, as if they are not experiencing them already,” he said.
Villalpando describes himself as an expert at developing a child’s gender identity, according to his scrubbed website reviewed by Fox News. He stated on his website, “While I absolutely love working with young children, my passions really lie in teaching others why we do the things we do, and advocating on behalf of young children and their families. My research and interest areas is in gender development in young children, and the impact that early educators have on that development.”
[…]
On another occasion, he said on his Instagram, “I’m tired of the ‘Childhood Innocence’ argument… Stop blaming a phenomenon that doesn’t exist.”
He went on to attack the idea that children shouldn’t be exposed to “sexuality,” claiming that “such a view is a very white, Christian, upper-class, cis-gendered, and hetero-centric.”
“Not talking about Queerness in the Classroom, is NOT Letting Children be Children. It’s Telling Those people They Do Not Deserve to Exist,” he said in September 2021. “Kids are never too young.” —FoxNews
The brain of a child is wired very differently than the brain of a teen or an adult. Puberty is a big part of the reason, and so is emotional development and the ability to make informed moral choices.
We call these people ‘groomers’ precisely because people like Willy are actively tearing down one of the very same safeguards that sexual predators must overcome before they can coax vulnerable young people into situations where they can be exploited.
Have a look at the warning signs and patterns of behavior exhibited by sexual predators who ‘groom’ their victims, as laid out by a website offering resources to raise awareness about sexual violence and exploitation:
Desensitization to touch and discussion of sexual topics: Abusers will often start to touch a victim in ways that appear harmless, such as hugging, wrestling and tickling, and later escalate to increasingly more sexual contact, such as massages or showering together. Abusers may also show the victim pornography or discuss sexual topics with them, to introduce the idea of sexual contact.
Attempt by abusers to make their behavior seem natural, to avoid raising suspicions. For teens, who may be closer in age to the abuser, it can be particularly hard to recognize tactics used in grooming. Be alert for signs that your teen has a relationship with an adult that includes secrecy, undue influence or control, or pushes personal boundaries. — RAINN
Compare this quote to what the preschool teacher is insisting should be a normalized part of the curriculum of early childhood education.
The only open question is whether the similarity of his public statements to sexual grooming tactics is motivated by actual sexual perversion or as a consequence of rabid adherence to an ideology that ‘just happened’ to be written by creepy left-wing modern philosophers with notorious proclivities toward the exploitation of children.
For reference, even hard-left Wiki hasn’t hidden this inconvenient historical fact about prominent leftist intellectuals whose fingerprints are all over the left’s latest push in rewriting sex and culture:
In 1977, a petition was addressed to the French parliament calling for changes to several articles of the age of consent law. A number of French intellectuals—including Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida, Louis Aragon, Roland Barthes, Simone de Beauvoir, Jean-Paul Sartre, Félix Guattari, Michel Leiris, Alain Robbe-Grillet, Philippe Sollers, Jacques Rancière, Jean-François Lyotard, Francis Ponge, Bernard Besret [fr] and various prominent doctors and psychologists—signed the petition. In 1979 two open letters were published in French newspapers defending individuals arrested under charges of statutory rape, in the context of reformation of age of consent laws.
Many of the signatories – including, but not limited to Foucault, Danet and Hocquenghem – later argued in favor of legalizing sex with children, claiming a child can consent – “listen to what the child says and give it a certain credence. This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love.” The same year, Michel Foucault presented to the Commission for the Revision of the Penal Code to equalize and lower the age of consent to 13. In 1977 and 1979, two open letters were published in French newspapers defending individuals arrested under charges of statutory rape. In 1977, another petition was addressed to the French parliament calling for the abrogation of several articles of the age of consent law. The laws were considered an infringement on the sexual autonomy of children. — Wiki
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:
If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.
