Watch: CNN’s ‘Tech Issues’ Protect Pelosi From The HARD Questions About Insider Trading
Pelosi is shocked, has Tapper forgotten he works for CNN... and by extension, the DNC?
She’s so used to the subservience of bootlicking journos that she gets really testy when Tapper DARES to ask her a hard question after Trump makes news about her.
Tapper, still reeling from the mockery he faced after writing that book about Biden’s decline after holding the line in protecting him for years, tried to approximate the job of a real journalist in asking Pelosi a difficult question.
The inciting incident for this question goes back to the P.E.L.O.S.I. Act that is being proposed in Congress. It stands for Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments.
It’s a long-standing joke that she and her husband just ‘happen’ to have an investment record that mysteriously knows exactly when to zig and zag to maximize returns, so much so that there are investment tools that literally make moves to mirror her trades in hopes of mirroring her results. If anyone but a Congressman did what they do, it would be prosecuted as insider trading. Martha Stewart did time over it back in the day.
But Pelosi…? She makes out like a bandit and laughs all the way to the bank.
Trump torched her over it by name, suggesting she should be investigated for her suspiciously high returns.
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump calls for Nancy Pelosi to be INVESTIGATED for insider trading
“Nancy Pelosi became rich by having insider information …I think that’s disgraceful.”
“She has the highest return of practically, ANYBODY in the history of Wall Street…
HOW DID THAT… pic.twitter.com/M6pM9UR9Nn
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 30, 2025
Tapper tried to do the job of an actual journalist, but, wouldn’t ya know it, there were ‘technical issues’ in pulling up the video Tapper asked for… and when Tapper tried to read the quote and ask a question about it, Pelosi went on offense, trying to shut down the question before he could even ask it.
Why so defensive, Nancy? https://t.co/GN9V8tDq17 pic.twitter.com/uNdaTakRMT
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 30, 2025
Surely she would not object to an investigation of her investment habits. After all, as she so frequently reminded us, ‘no one is above the law’.