Dems Double Down On Anti-Kirk Rhetoric, Even Playing The Race Card Against… Each Other!
These networks might want to start fact-checking their guests just to protect against legal exposure
On the same day that America was honoring the life of a man who was murdered in cold blood by some kind of a leftwing political zealot, Dems took to the Sunday shows to denounce everything he stood for.
It wasn’t enough that they perpetuate the tired slanders about his supposed hateful rhetoric, they went out of their way to paint the man as a bigot, too. In Jasmine Crocket’s case, she made an outrageous attempt at flipping the political narrative in which she tried to literally make the murder of Charlie Kirk an opportunity to turn HIM into the villain and — worse still — make an appeal for sympathy as his ‘victim’.
Just when you thought the ‘words are violence’ crowd took it about as low as it can go, Crockett accused the white Dems in her party of — you guessed it — being racist because they did not oppose a vote to dedicate a national day of remembrance to Charlie Kirk.
Crockett was one of the 58 no votes.
DANA BASH: "There were 58 Democrats who voted against a Charlie Kirk resolution, you were one, why?"
JASMINE CROCKETT: "One of the things I do want to point out that's not been laid out, that honestly hurts my heart, is when I saw the no votes, there were only two Caucasians." pic.twitter.com/jZyeNQZrcc
— Thomas Hern (@ThomasMHern) September 21, 2025
Ilhan, predictiably, was doubling down on her past rhetoric and smears.
Jeffries was the guest on a show hosted by a host who personally triggered a fatal New York race riot.
True to his brand, he accused the GOP of memorializing Charlie not because he was a human being whose life was cut short by a malevolent political activist, but because the GOP thought they found a wedge issue to divide the Dems.
“This probably was an attempt by some on the Right to try to divide the Congressional black caucus or divide House Democrats, and we will continue to be as unified as ever in pushing back against Donald Trump and his extremism.”
Wait… WHAT?!
In a move that somehow seems outrageous for the already over the top Democrats, here's House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries saying a resolution to honor Charlie Kirk was an attempt by Republicans to divide his party:
“This probably was an attempt by some on the… pic.twitter.com/WhIWYJiawt
— Conservative Brief (@ConservBrief) September 21, 2025
News flash Hakeem, if you strip away grievance and the threat of a phantom ‘common enemy’ your coalition is cobbled together out of people with very little in common. Even just within, say, the rainbow coalition, you’ve got tension between the LGB and the T segments of the supposedly ‘unified’ community. The various interest groups want different things and are pulling in different directions.
Whatever they might say about their moral high ground, it would be hard to make any credible case that their party’s platform is not built on shared principles and values that don’t require a shared boogeyman to rage against.
AOC made use of her immunity to personally slander Kirk from the House.
Keep talking, @AOC. People can watch Charlie speak on these issues all over the internet, and everything you’ve said about him is a disgusting lie. Keep speaking ill of a good man who was murdered in cold blood—you’re actively creating more Republicans.
pic.twitter.com/L6DeOJkqVj— Coco 🇺🇸 (@CoClarified) September 19, 2025
But our side is supposed to ‘take the temperature down’, right Hakeem? You mean, just like Schumer that is STILL running the ‘threat to democracy’ gambit?
You can’t even keep your side from slandering each other and you dare to wag your finger at US?
Kick rocks, Hakeem. You’re an unserious person.