WATCH: Congressman GRILLS Abortion Activist With Some BRUTAL Questions
Brings his ruthless efficiency to hearings about abortion
The main focus of the hearing was to discuss how the FACE ACT had been weaponized against pro-life conservatives while clearly ignoring the implications and protections that same act went in the other way.
The hearing had a title, ‘From Tool to Weapon: The FACE Act and the Dangers of Federalizing Criminal Law’.
But the few minutes allotted to each Congressman is his own to use as he sees fit, to raise the questions he wants answered.
Brandon Gill took the time to address the abortion expert about some very specific and detailed descriptions about the procedures by which abortion is conducted.
There was nothing about his question that was remotely emotional. His questions were almost academic. If he was asking about any other topic, they would seem almost boring.
But these questions had purpose: they were bringing into the light of day the acts and procedures the left now claims to ‘love’ (ie: shout your abortion) with all of the sanitized euphemisms stripped away.
Here is the video:
I described some of the most common methods of abortion to one of the abortion industry’s top legal scholars.
As you can see, the barbaric truth wasn't something she wanted to hear. pic.twitter.com/wqtyw84RZh
— Brandon Gill (@realBrandonGill) April 28, 2026
And here is the post that went with it:
I described some of the most common methods of abortion to one of the abortion industry’s top legal scholars.
As you can see, the barbaric truth wasn't something she wanted to hear. pic.twitter.com/wqtyw84RZh
— Brandon Gill (@realBrandonGill) April 28, 2026
What made HIS questions different is how matter-of-factly he laid bare the actual horror of what activists want us to see as nothing more than an anodyne medical procedure.
You will note that even the abortion activist was getting obviously uncomfortable with the descriptions he was giving of the various methods of abortion that are employed.
The reason she was squirming is the very same reason we see such violent objection to poster-sized images of the same realities, especially images of the dismembered unborn baby.
So long as it’s ‘just a clump of cells’ nobody cares.
But when your own eyes can piece together a human form from the dismembered pieces…? Natural moral revulsion can respond to that in a way it can never respond to sanitized euphemisms like ‘products of conception’.