The man and his reputation are already taking an unbelievable beating — you wouldn’t think THIS group would pile on with everyone else.
A man who — until nominated — had risen to the position of a judge, a man with an unblemished reputation and career, a man who is active in his church, who even volunteers at a soup kitchen was considered an exemplar to follow.
That was before the allegations began.
Now the Media and half the country are ready to register him as a sex offender, despite the fact that he’s never once been charged with a crime, let alone convicted.
And now, a Catholic group is throwing him under the bus… ‘for the greater good’.
The editors of this review have no special insight into who is telling the truth. If Dr. Blasey’s allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaugh’s name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country.
The editors continue, noting that if this were simply a legal or moral issue, Kavanaugh’s presumption of innocence “might settle the matter in his favor, absent further investigation and new evidence.” However, this nomination, they argue, has a wider scope:
In addition to being a fight over policy issues, which it already was, his nomination has also become a referendum on how to address allegations of sexual assault.
We’d link to the original story, but we are seeing this:
He’s still presumed innocent. But he’s ‘tainted’, now?
Do they not see the game that’s being played?
Even regular nominations for minor posts, the ‘problem’ of their religious belief was raised in two cases.
They are systematically opposing and tainting everyone who opposes their worldview.
Commit this axiom to memory: “Rewarded Behavior is Repeated Behavior”
If destroying a good man will score a political victory, they will slander more and more, until any good man who doesn’t share the secular ideology is too scared to accept a nomination.\
It’s not about the good of the nation. It’s a naked power play.
If they think we’re still playing a gentleman’s game here, they just aren’t paying attention. Staged protests held him hostage in an elevator. Soro ‘Dark money’ is driving this. He doesn’t give a rat’s ass about your morality. There are winners and the people who get crushed along the way.
That’s what we’re up against.
If just being slandered means you pull the nomination, then face it: you’ve just made your last appointment. Because you’ve already lost the ‘game’.
The Jesuits were founded on the following idea:
Whoever desires to serve as a soldier of God beneath the banner of the Cross in our Society, which we desire to be designated by the Name of Jesus, and to serve the Lord alone and the Church, his spouse, under the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth, should, after a solemn vow of perpetual chastity, poverty and obedience, keep what follows in mind. He is a member of a Society founded chiefly for this purpose: to strive especially for the defence and propagation of the faith and for the progress of souls in Christian life and doctrine, by means of public preaching, lectures and any other ministration whatsoever of the Word of God, and further by means of retreats, the education of children and unlettered persons in Christianity, and the spiritual consolation of Christ’s faithful through hearing confessions and administering the other sacraments. Moreover, he should show himself ready to reconcile the estranged, compassionately assist and serve those who are in prisons or hospitals, and indeed, to perform any other works of charity, according to what will seem expedient for the glory of God and the common good. — Wiki
Look at Kavanaugh, his family, his unblemished adult life.
The burden of proof is on his accuser.
And there are holes you could drive a Mac truck through in her testimony. Here is just one.
They say for the ‘good of the country’ he should pull his name.
We say, for the good of the country, he absolutely should not.