Hillary Defends Kavanaugh’s Accuser – Bill Clinton Accuser Thinks That’s RICH

Written by K. Walker on September 19, 2018

Hillary seems to have to weigh in on everything, doesn’t she?

Everything except her 30,000 lost emails, that is.

She’s back again. Actually — how can she be back again if she just won’t go away?

How about, she’s back on prime time tv being interviewed again.

Failed Presidential Candidate, Hillary Clinton, appeared on Rachel Maddow’s show to promote an addendum to her book, What Happened, because she presumably has found new sources on which to assign blame for her election loss. Of course, while she was there, she spoke on just about everything, including the sexual assault allegations against Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh.

She opined, ‘we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country‘ and not move forward with a confirmation as scheduled. Not only that, she cited her ‘friend and mentor’ ex-KKK recruiter Sen. Robert Byrd at the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings when she said it.

I kid you not.

HILLARY: I remember back in the Thomas hearing when Senator Byrd was asked what he was going to do, and he said in a situation like this we should give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that’s what the Republicans should be doing right now, from the White House down Pennsylvania avenue to the Senate, give the benefit of the doubt to the court and the country. And that means have an investigation that will then lead to a hearing that will then lead to a vote if appropriate.

Oh. My. Gosh.

I’m sure that there was no ulterior motive for Byrd to question the legitimacy of Thomas’s appropriateness for the appointment to the Supreme Court, right?

I guess we should be grateful that he didn’t give the answer, ‘Burn a cross‘ in front of Thomas’s home.

Hillary didn’t stop there, though. She went on to say that the new stalling tactic  letter sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyer stating that her client will not testify before the Committee until the FBI investigates the 35-year old misdemeanor claim is a ‘reasonable request.’

And then, she really stepped in it.

The White House could answer [Ford’s request] very quickly by asking the FBI to reopen its background check and to take into account the accusation that’s been made and to gather the evidence about what can be known. So far, they haven’t done that. And as someone who has watched this process unfold over many years, there does have to be some direction given to the FBI to pursue an investigation.

How can Hillary say that she supports the investigation into what might have amounted to a misdemeanor charge for a man who was a minor at the time, (except that the statute of limitations has passed on this alleged crime,) and not want her own husband investigated for actual rape?

It boggles the mind.

If there’s one topic that Hillary shouldn’t discuss, it’s allegations of sexual assault committed decades before by a man in Washington.

She’s still married to Bill Clinton, for crying out loud!

That’s what caused Juanita Broaddrick to start tweeting furiously.

It’s obvious that people don’t even know the details of the Broaddrick accusations. She had come forward to several people. She was bruised and shaken and found by Norma Roberts in a hotel room with a bruised upper lip ‘crying and in a state of shock.’

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Sen. Chuck Schumer, Sen. Dick Durbin, they were all in Congress in 1999 when the Broaddrick allegations were made public.

They did nothing to support the accuser in 1999.

What a difference 19 years and an ‘R’ after your name makes.

And now, it’s commonly believed that Juanita Broaddrick had her allegations investigated and litigated.

Juanita sets the record straight.

Juanita then dumped some ice-water on CNN’s Chris Cillizza’s snarky anti-Trump tweet:


So, why believe the accuser now?

Especially when there are credible reasons to believe she might be doing this for political reasons or possible revenge, or maybe just because Dr. Blasey Ford seems to be the only one that has any knowledge of the party where the alleged attempted assault took place and is unable to give the details.

Juanita Broaddrick had details. She had a date, time, place, and a witness who corroborated her story.

Yet, Hillary still said that this was just a part of the ‘bimbo eruptions’ because of the ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’ out to get her husband.

Stay your classy self, Hill.

There was a lot of support for Juanita Broaddrick’s perspective on Twitter:

Let’s not forget, Juanita wasn’t the only woman to come forward.

Hillary dismissed all of Bill’s accusers.

Why the hell should we listen to her opine on this issue at all?

We shouldn’t have to.

She should keep her yap shut.

Besides, she lost the election.

Just go back to the woods with your Chardonnay, Hillary.

Give us some time to attempt to miss you.

Or not.


ClashDaily's Associate Editor since August 2016. Self-described political junkie, anti-Third Wave Feminist, and a nightmare to the 'intersectional' crowd. Mrs. Walker has taken a stand against 'white privilege' education in public schools. She's also an amateur Playwright, former Drama teacher, and staunch defender of the Oxford comma. Follow her humble musings on Twitter: @TheMrsKnowItAll and on Gettr @KarenWalker