The ‘Zodiac Killer’ takes down yet another victim with facts and logic.
The carnage started simply enough.
It was just another blue-check leftist tweeting ridiculous unsubstantiated trash about the political right. They do it expecting they can get away with it.
And normally, they can, too. Unless the critics have a blue check as well, chances are, they’re immune to most of the outrage. They won’t even see it.
But most certainly would have seen his old student Ted Cruz weigh in.
Here’s what Laurence Tribe said:
White Supremacists oppose abortion because they fear it’ll reduce the number of white infants and thus contribute to what they fear as non-white “replacement.” Never underestimate the way these issues and agendas are linked. This turns “intersectionality” on its head.
— Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ (@tribelaw) August 11, 2019
Isn’t it interesting how everyone on the Left suddenly knows everything there is to know about the inner workings of racist thinking?
But look at what he’s claiming. He claims abortion is opposed due to depressed birth rates of white babies. Fewer white babies means that other races (read ‘brown’ or ‘black’) will overtake and overwhelm the population NOT filled by white babies.
How sound is that logic? Not very.
In fact, it’s laughably simplistic… an argument unworthy of any college prof, let alone a professor at Harvard Law.
1/2 My old con law prof, sadly, being deeply deceptive. Abortion targets in particular minority women. More than 1/2 of African-American babies, tragically, are aborted. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was a vehement advocate of eugenics. https://t.co/Lx0T7XBLUy https://t.co/PjFR9loFnV
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) August 11, 2019
2/2 Here’s one particularly nasty quote from Margaret Sanger (1939): “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." https://t.co/LV0YgDqxyb
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) August 11, 2019
Comments tried to refute Cruz. He welcomed them and batted those down, too.
[If you enjoyed that, there’s more like it about the (footnoted history) of Margaret Sanger’s connection to Eugenics and White Supremacy in the book: Would Jesus Vote For Trump which is available on Amazon.]Yes, PLEASE read full context. In 1926, Sanger spoke at a KKK rally in NJ. Her publications include: "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (Jun 1920); "The Purpose of Eugenics" (Dec 1924); "Birth Control & Positive Eugenics" (July 1925) & "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (Aug 1928). https://t.co/oTDdfH1c96
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) August 11, 2019
And just to prove he wasn’t interested in flinging hyperbole — when Cruz realized he was off in the numbers, he corrected the record.
A slight correction. Although some cities (eg, NYC) see over 50% abortion rates (in 2012-16 black mothers terminated 136,426 pregnancies & gave birth to 118,127 babies), nationally the total is just over 40%—still tragically high.https://t.co/EgZKw25nrmhttps://t.co/N2YpQw0mte https://t.co/LV0YgDqxyb
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) August 11, 2019
Yes, you read that correctly. In NYC, more black babies were aborted than born.
Which is why this scribbler answered this tweet just a little differently than Ted Cruz did.
You DO know that statistically more NON-white babies are lost to abortion, right?
But don't let that get in the way of your narrative or anything.
— Wes Walker (@Republicanuck) August 12, 2019
Does it really make sense that ‘white supremacists’ would be bothered by the loss of a few white babies and a lot of brown babies if their real motive was numerical superiority?
Or could it be that snuffing the life out of white, brown, black or any other babies is a horrific waste of human life no matter what the ethnicity of that baby’s parents happens to be? You know, ‘made in the image of God’ and all that?
