Hey NYT: Why Is The ‘Paper Of Record’ Revising History On The Sly?

Written by Wes Walker on October 25, 2019

Did you think nobody would notice? And are you now so openly ‘in the tank’ for Hillary, and anti-Trump that you’re just making stuff up now?

One of the hallmarks of Trump’s presidency is that he’s shone a great big spotlight on the political corruption that has taken hold of the Media(D).

They don’t even PRETEND to be non-partisan anymore.

Again and again, the media gets caught peddling bogus stories or treating similar stories differently depending on what party is doing it.

And now… they just busted ‘sanitizing’ the public record so that when historians look up Hillary’s public comments denouncing Tulsi Gabbard as a Russian asset, it will not be Hillary making the assertion.

Original version…

The revised version…

That’s a helluva difference, don’t you think?

Did NYT think that other sources wouldn’t be available to refute their retelling of history?

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) came to the defense of fellow 2020 presidential contender Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) on Monday after Hillary Clinton appeared to suggest Gabbard was getting a campaign boost from Russia.

Sanders called the former Democratic presidential nominee’s suggestion “outrageous” and pointed to Gabbard’s military record, which includes time in an Iraqi combat zone. — Source: Huffpo

Little Jimmy Acosta freaks out whenever we DARE to question the integrity of journalists. But where is he when journalists themselves are putting the profession in disrepute?

Ironically, the endless public shaming by someone like Trump could be exactly the medicine the journalistic profession needs to fix what ails it.

Related…

LEAKED: New York Times Staff Meeting Reveals The NEW Plan On How To Cover President Trump