If the Democrats *wanted* to send a message that this is a witchhunt with a for-ordained conclusion, they could hardly do more than what they’ve done so far. Look at their ‘witnesses’ for example.
We’re supposed to take these people seriously, are we?
In answering a question posed by Sheila Jackson Lee — who is herself on the shortlist of Democrats too absurd for parody — Professor Pamela Karlan uses the President’s young son to illustrate her point about the tyranny of kings.
Not cool, Karlan.
Would you have done the same with Obama’s teenage girls? We all know the answer to that, now, don’t we?
She learned not to piss off a mom. Fortunately for Karlan, or FLOTUS is not as bombastic as her husband, and her fierce protective instincts were tempered by her typical poise and grace:
A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.
— Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) December 4, 2019
Not that this should in any way surprise us. She’s long since tipped her hand about what she REALLY thinks about ‘those’ people.
Again, if you were inclined to believe the Democrats' witnesses are giving unbiased analysis…
Here is Pamela Karlan, law professor Democrats invited to urge impeachment, explaining how she once decided to cross the street rather than walk by Trump Hotel pic.twitter.com/xWVqhhPtQx
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) December 4, 2019
Pretty rich for someone who took offense to a Republican’s reference to her ‘Ivory Tower’, eh?
She was eventually shamed into an apology…
“I want to apologize for what I said earlier about the president's son. It was wrong of me to do that. I wish the president would apologize, obviously, for the things that he's done that's wrong, but I do regret having said that."pic.twitter.com/q7FGEHVsxI
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 4, 2019
If you can even call it that.
Gee, now we know why the Democrats liked this witness.
She’s one of their own.