If even the government’s own data shows one-in-five votes are probably bogus, shouldn’t the Registrar of Voters take an interest in it?

That depends on whether you are committed to the interests of the voter, or the interests of the party in power.

From Reagan to Newsom: What Changed?

.

How did California, the state that gave us Reagan, become the playground of Feinstein, Newsom, and Schiff? Maybe voters swung left. Or maybe something’s rotten in the voter rolls.

Long-time readers may remember, ClashDaily would often reference an article, read and approved of by @jack, head of Twitter 1.0, bragging the left could ram their policies down the throats of Red America, whether The Deplorables wanted it or not. We covered it in 2018: “Leftists Want A ‘New Civil War’ – This Post Is Disturbing”

Just a taste:

The solution for the people of California was to reconfigure the political landscape and shift a supermajority of citizens — and by extension their elected officials — under the Democratic Party’s big tent. The natural continuum of more progressive to more moderate solutions then got worked out within the context of the only remaining functioning party.

The blue team wanted power, and the means to get that power was to create a one-party state. Then that party could decide among themselves how the permanent ruling class would direct the state (and ultimately, the nation).

All in the defense of democracy, dontcha know.

It is never explicitly stated how they managed to take a red state and make it functionally a one-party blue state. We’re left to assume that voters were convinced to vote left. With the power of Silicon Valley and Big Media in their corner… maybe? But there’s another explanation.

Remember how Judicial Watch won a court case telling California to clean up their voter rolls, but they didn’t fully comply requiring a follow-up lawsuit?

Any guesses as to why Dems fight so hard against the sorts of measures that tighten up the one-citizen one-vote model? Only cynical GOP partisans would possibly suggest that inflated voter rolls give latitude to hide bogus votes among the real ones in ballot-stuffing schemes.

There’s nothing to back up such outrageous claims, surely. Just ask any Democrat, they’ll set you straight.

It should be no problem to back up those Democrat claims of legitimacy against official voter rolls, right?

The Smoking Gun in Orange County

Jom Hoft tried doing exactly that. The results were… interesting.

He took a statistical sampling of California’s OWN official data for Orange County California, ran it through some very specific tests of the sort that give insight to broader patters and discovered some alarming statistics about Orange County’s voter data.

When he took his findings (and methods!) from his April 7th article back to the Registrar of Voters… you can guess how that went. He kicked it over to a group of ‘experts’ who had already shown themselves to be pro-establishment partisans on election integrity questions.

From the earlier article:

A random sample of 609 voter records from a population of 1.4 million voters in the 2024 election was generated based on a 90% confidence interval, a precision of 0.02 and a predicted prevalence of P = 0.1. The population was obtained from voter history files requested from Orange County and state entities.

When extrapolating the sample results to the population of vote records in the 2024 Election, the following was exposed:

• 74,000 voters were non-citizens, or totally fake—they don’t exist in our multiple database review
• 86,000 voters did not live at the address they reportedly voted from
• 61,000 don’t have a Social Security number or their SSN is shared with others , and
• 77,000 ballots counted cannot be reconciled with any voter who voted

When election officials count votes from unverified or ineligible individuals, non-citizens, and fictitious voters in congressional elections, it is a federal crime. Before any ballot can be legally counted, the official has to be certain it is legitimate. Before any election can be certified, the number of lawful votes counted must equal the number of lawful voters who voted. Outcomes must be provable using official records.

In other words, according to the ROV’s own information, 21% (1-in-5 votes) is completely bogus.

If Dems really care about ‘threats to Democracy’, they should look at illegal ballots.

Just saying nobody has been prosecuting fake voters not the same thing as knowing nobody is committing voter fraud. It could be that nobody cared until now.

Or worse still, maybe someone did care, because they were invested in seeing a bogus outcome.

Either way, it’s not just a crime, it’s an offense against the will of the people itself.

And we’ve seen in this article how the left, in their own words, already admits to caring more about the Blue team gaining one-party supremacy than they do about the common man having his voice heard, irrespective of any political preferences.