Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

News Clash

Renee Good Shot Dead By ICE Agents… Here’s What We Know (Video)

Minnesota is once again the focal point of a 'use of force' controversy

Like so many issues of the day, partisans on both sides are donning their red or blue jerseys even before they know what happened. Here are the known facts:

First off, the fact that there’s a lot of misinformation about this incident going around should be assumed as a given for any event of its kind.

Social media is very much a “better to be first than be right” kind of environment. In many instances, circulating reports even share a photo of an entirely unrelated Renee Good.

Long story short(er), Minnesota saw candlelight vigils for one Renee Good (37) after she was fatally shot in an altercation with ICE agents while behind the wheel of her vehicle yesterday.

We found one post showing four different video clips and angles. Our readers can decide for themselves who they think is at fault in this altercation. From a different vantage point and another social media account we see a set of videos showing the woman reported to be Renee’s wife, standing outside of the vehicle, filming the incident in real time, with detailed descriptions of what she was doing/saying before and after, as well as some insight into how that poster believes the current culture of activism is actively creating situations that are far more dangerous for all involved.

It would have been easy enough predict the responses, both left and right, long before we knew any of the details. One side presents law enforcement as universally evil, especially as it touches on enforcing law that has been on the books since long before Trump ever took to politics, but whose enforcement was generally lax.

The political right generally sees anti-ICE protesters as some grab-bag combination of motives. They can range from misguided do-gooders, or simple Dem-friendly political agendas, to astroturf protesters whose motivation is whatever the guy paying the crowd-for-hire says it is, and people who (for any variety of reasons) think they are doing the world a favor by bringing down the American government and/or economy to replace it with… well, they’ll face that fight when they get there. Any number of contenders will want to have their say, so long as it isn’t what the Framers built in the first place.

Watching the video was enough for many to skip right past the court process and land right on the determination of innocence or guilt… and this is the case on both sides.

In Tim Walz’ mind, for example, this was murder in cold blood, and Renee Good deserves justice. He was one of many Dems to weigh in and encourage opposition to the presence of ICE to intensify — even as agitators were already getting into physical altercations with ICE in an ongoing investigation, which — let our readers remember — was triggered in direct response to evidence of multi-billion dollar fraud fleecing these same taxpayers.

Chuck Schumer wasted no time before he began finger-wagging ICE officials for failing to ‘cooperate with’ local law enforcement in Minnesota when Walz has been openly defying and opposing their work at every opportunity.

Trump, not surprisingly, has strong opinions on the other side, reading the events as clear examples of self-defense.

[Side Note: Usually, the truth of the matter lies somewhere between the edge cases. Probably this case too. If you want proof of just how fickle the crowd can be, just remember that we are almost 5 years to the day after the exact same political interests took almost the exact opposite positions when an unarmed Ashli Babbitt was shot dead by an armed cop who was given a pass for what is still seen by many as an unprovoked murder. The fact that the Chief Medical Examiner tried to rush a cremation of Babbitt’s body because it was ‘high profile’ would have been HUGE news if it implicated the OTHER political party.]

The Minnesota Police And Peace Officers Association called for elected officials to dial down their rhetoric, which plays a direct role in creating scenarios and stand-off that can go very bad, very quickly.

Kristi Noem shares that position and took a media availablity presser to explain events leading up to the incident (agents pushing one of their vehicles out of the snow) and Noems’ understanding of how events played out.

She also made it clear that the emerging pattern and growing threat of weaponizing vehicles against agents will be taken seriously and agents are under instructions to treat any such threats directed against law enforcement as acts of ‘domestic terrorism’.

Note the last thing she says in this clip: ‘the very same officer who was attacked today had previously been dragged by an anti-ICE rioter who had rammed him with a car and drug[sic] him back in June. He sustained injuries at that time as well.

Tom Homan, of all the elected officials and government appointees we’ve seen, seems to be taking the most balanced stance on this event.

“It would be unprofessional of me to comment. Let the investigation play out and hold people accountable.”

As you would expect after any lethal law-enforcement incident, there will be an investigation of the actions.

There are three plausible outcomes to such an investigation. The obvious first two are that the driver or the agent will be found to be principally in the wrong.

The other plausible outcome is that the tension of the situation where she had been part of a group of agitators shadowing/harassing the work of this team for a prolonged period of time and hampering their law enforcement efforts, against the recent historical backdrop of unprecedented violence against ICE agents doing their jobs, including vehicle attacks against them surging 1300% in a single year put the agent in a split-second grey-area judgment call of how serious the threat against his life really was… and the fact that anti-ICE agitators have dragged him behind their vehicles in the past, causing injury, could be a mitigating factor.

The TL;DR version:
It’s far too soon to know what the FBI will find in this situation. And yes, they are on the case.

On one end of the spectrum, it could be sent over for a criminal referral as a wrongful use of lethal force.

On the other end, it could be dismissed as self-defense and a lethal case of FAFO.

Honest politicians, where they exist, will admit that coming to a conclusion on that question will take some time. If even John Adams gave redcoats their day in court, and stood as their attorney in defending them, surely this agent is entitled to enter into this process with that same presumption of innocence.

Wes Walker

Wes Walker is the author of "Blueprint For a Government that Doesn't Suck". He has been lighting up Clashdaily.com since its inception in July of 2012. Follow on twitter: @Republicanuck