Fulton County’s FINALLY Getting A Visit From The FBI — Can You Guess Why?

All the trouble of J6 could have been avoided if we had resolved these unanswered questions while they were still relevant. This investigation will not change history, but it just might help avoid repeating it.

We now have official news that the FBI is investigating Fulton County’s election records, and is in the process of taking possession of some 700 boxes of relevant documents.

The ‘reputable’ media couldn’t resist the temptation of editorializing when Reuters wrote:

The FBI searched an election office in Georgia’s Fulton County outside Atlanta on Wednesday, pursuing U.S. President Donald Trump’s false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of widespread voting fraud.
The FBI said in a brief statement that its agents executed a warrant at the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center in Union City, a large, warehouse-like facility opened by Georgia officials in 2023, and called it a “court-authorized law enforcement activity.”

Can you spot it? ‘False claims.’

They are claims. Full stop. Neither true nor false.

They have not been tested. It is therefore definitionally incorrect to call them true or false, except as a private opinion. And we have been assured that News Feeds like AP and Reuters are straight news, and no opinion. (In case anyone needed yet another reminder of why trust in the press-titutes is right up there with seafood sold out of somebody’s trunk.

The Fulton County Commissioner, Mo Ivory chose to go full offence:

Fulton County Commissioner Mo Ivory: “This is an assault on your vote.” pic.twitter.com/VQlEYtLHuI

— Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) January 28, 2026

As if this is some kind of a witch-hunt. But there’s a problem with her theory. See the warrant? We highlighted a few relevant words from it. Maybe if Reuters isn’t too busy, they can take a peek at it.

Criminal Offence? Violation of Title 52? sections 20701 AND 20511?

That sounds super-official. But what does it mean?

52 U.S. Code § 20701 – Retention and preservation of records and papers by officers of elections; deposit with custodian; penalty for violation — Cornell Law’s site defines it for you here.

Ok, mishandling of records. What about the other one?

Found it here. But I suspect THIS may be the relevant section:

And can anyone be happier about this turn of the news cycle than…

…Kari Lake?

A judge gave a warrant.

There was probable cause for charges… in Fulton County of all places.

Reuters editorializing aside, some of the questions that were never adequately answered can now be properly asked and adjudicated.

Obviously, no promises can be made about the answers those questions will lead to, but it is interesting to note that the Dems — despite egregious chain of custody and signature issues discovered in the original tabulation — is already trying to introduce suspicion that Trump’s team will manipulate the evidence.

Wouldn’t THAT serve as a handy alibi supposing their documents don’t match up, as we would expect with a warrant of this type.

Here’s hoping the DOJ will have security cameras recording what happens with every box for every second that it is in their custody, as a way to temper any such allegations.

And how seriously is this administration taking this question?

There are reports of Tulsi Gabbard showing up, in person, as the warrant was being executed. She doesn’t strike me as someone who plays games with this sort of issue.