A Politically Incorrect Guide to ‘Sexual Orientation’

800px-Miniature_Donkey,_San_Francisco_ZooIt’s a mixed up muddled up shook up world … ~ The Kinks

Through the secular-”progressive” looking-glass, the term “sexual orientation” has, in a few short years, evolved to accommodate an ever-expanding fruit basket of carnal appetites.

First it was “LGB” – liberal shorthand for “lesbian, gay and bisexual.” Then they added a “T” for “transgender.” That’s cross-dressing. You know, fellas like 45-year-old Clay Francis (aka, “Colleen”).

Mr. Francis enjoys macramé, long walks on the beach, wearing lady knickers and showering fully nude with 6-year-old girls.

Because it’s illegal to “discriminate based on the basis of gender identity,” and since it’s the only “tolerant” thing to do, this brave bellwether of the persecuted LGBT victim-class has secured the “civil right” for him and other men to fully expose themselves to your daughter in the locker room at Olympia, Washington’s Evergreen State College.

But slow down, Dad. According to the law, if you have a problem with Mr. Francis baring all to your baby girl, then you’re the problem. You’re a “transphobe” (“homophobia’s” evil twin sister, er, brother … whatever). Deck this sicko for terrifying your first-grader and you’re off to jail while “Colleen” is off to the “Human Rights Campaign” for a commendation as the latest victim of an “anti-LGBT hate crime.”

Rosa Parks in drag, I guess.

But to make sure they didn’t miss anyone, pooh-bahs over at Child Corruption Central added a “Q” to the “sexual orientation” mix. In case some fifth-grader in Ms. Adamsapple’s health class gets the urge to “taste the rainbow” (and I don’t mean Skittles), the catch-all term “questioning” was tacked on.

Gotta meet those recruiting quotas.

According to the “gay” activist group GLSEN, sexuality is “fluid” and “may change over time.” Unless, of course, you’re already “gay,” and then change is impossible, fixed and immutable. Like that hotel in California, “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.”

Nobody said it’s supposed to make sense.

Still, because “progressives” aren’t progressive unless they’re progressing toward progress, this nonsensical alphabet soup of sexual deviancy has ballooned to a marvelous “LGBTQQIAAP.”

No kidding.

The latest word salad in the counter-”heterosexist” war against “heteronormativity” (yes, they consider these real things) is “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, Queer, Intersex, Asexual, Allies, and Pansexual.”

In Canada, they’ve added “2S” which means: “Two-spirit. The visionaries and healers of aboriginal (sic) communities, the gay and lesbian shamans.”

Well, duh.

I just can’t believe these closed-minded bigots left out members of the mistreated “BDSM” community (Bondage, Discipline, Sadism and Masochism). That’s OK, I guess. Being mistreated is their whole shtick, right? Or maybe they’re covered under “P” for “pansexual.” That means, more or less, that if the mood strikes, you’ll take a roll in the hay with anyone or anything in any way imaginable (or unimaginable).

Speaking of rolls in the hay, don’t put away your alphabet soup decoder ring just yet. It looks like we’ll soon be adding another “B” to the mix.

The late “gay” activist icon Frank Kameny – a pervert before his time – endorsed the practice of bestiality a few years ago. He called sex with animals “harmless,” saying that “as long as the animal doesn’t mind – and the animal rarely does – I don’t mind, and I don’t see why anyone else should.”

So we’ve further lowered the bar from “consenting adults” to “consenting adults and hoofed mammals.” How does that work? Bestiality is OK, but “neigh” means “neigh”?

In today’s frenzied struggle for unfettered sexual license cleverly couched as “civil rights,” we shouldn’t be surprised, then, that oppressed peoples representing all form of “sexual orientation” are lining up for their slice of “equality” pie.

Yes, even, um, animal lovers. According to a recent report by Florida’s Gainesville Sun, for instance, “Lawyers representing a Marion County man accused of sexual activity with a miniature donkey have filed a motion asking a judge to declare the Florida statute banning sexual activities with animals unconstitutional.”

“Carlos R. Romero, 32 … is accused of sexual activities involving animals, a first-degree misdemeanor, after he allegedly was found in a compromising position in August with a female miniature donkey named Doodle.”

First of all, I was offended by the article’s insensitive use of the term “miniature donkey.” I believe, if I’m not mistaken, the preferred nomenclature is “little horse.”

Still, I was especially struck – though not surprised – by the legal arguments Romero’s lawyers ponied up. They claimed “that the statute infringes upon Romero’s due process rights and violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment in the U.S. Constitution.”

“By making sexual conduct with an animal a crime, the statute demeans individuals like Defendant (Romero) by making his private sexual conduct a crime,” they wrote.

Right. The statute demeans Romero.

“The personal morals of the majority, whether based on religion or traditions, cannot be used as a reason to deprive a person of their personal liberties,” the attorneys wrote.

This line of argument is directly from the homosexual activist playbook – the rationale adopted by the majority in the landmark Lawrence v. Texas case. In Lawrence, the U.S. Supreme Court manufactured, for the first time in history, a constitutional “right” for men to sodomize each other.

So why not Doodle?

In his characteristically brilliant dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia forecast exactly what’s happened in the decade since: “State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers’ validation of laws based on moral choices,” he wrote. “Every single one of these laws is called into question by today’s decision.”

Predictably, polygamists and incestuous siblings are now clamoring for so-called “marriage equality” based on Lawrence. At this rate, there’s little doubt they’ll get it.

Once our culture decides, as a matter of course, that all morality is relative, all bets are off. Once we determine, as a matter of law, that people are entitled to special privilege because they subjectively define their identity based upon deviant sexual proclivities and behaviors, moral, legal and cultural anarchy are inevitable.

The brave new world is upon us.

Image: A Miniature Donkey, San Francisco Zoo – Children’s Zoo; author:Steven Walling; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license

About the author: Matt Barber

Matt Barber served as Policy Director for Cultural Issues with Concerned Women for America before joining Liberty University School of Law in 2008. In addition to his Juris Doctorate degree, Dean Barber holds a Master of Arts in Public Policy from Regent University and a Bachelor of Science in Organizational Management from Colorado Christian University.

View all articles by Matt Barber
  • MATTHEW

    WHOA! THIS GIVES NEW MEANING TO ITS ON LIKE DONKEY KONG! WHOA!

  • Benjamin

    Freaks.

  • Steven V

    Matt, well, your using logic, you can’t do that. Liberals get confused.

  • ary

    This is about spiritual bankruptcy, and obama and his “progressive” followers have pushed us toward spiritual bankruptcy right along with economic bankruptcy.

    Tolerance is just passivity in situations where God is being mocked in these ways.
    We can be loving and still speak out against immorality. And yes, there are such realities as immorality and sin.
    Our president the country be purged of “assault” weapons is idiotic when we’re being “assaulted” on all sides spiritually by our president, our state and national lawmakers and our state and national judges. Just as the current administration wants to take away all our rights to protect ourselves with guns, the our nation’s “leader”/nobel peace prize “winner” is fundamentally changing laws to take away all the protections for those who believe in God and want a Constitutionally, more spiritually conscious and inclined country. We must choose God as our “Shepherd”, not these flesh-and-blood and morally bankrupt leaders the masses want, elect, placate, and from whom they demand “privilege” like spoiled baby/brats. NO worldly leader or court can relieve the American people from the consequences of this type of moral behavior, if we do not unite and defend God and his Word.

  • marineh2ominer

    I am going to sue the department of education AND the civil rights commission because I was horny as a billy goat and lusted after ALL my teachers from fifth grade up , and NONE of them molested me , even though I would have happily given my consent numerous times every day , but instead I was sexually neglected and my rights were violated because of AGE discrimination . Furthermore my sexual education left me suffering my entire life time in not REALLY knowing how to please and thrill my female sexual partners .

  • slickzip

    Easy answer to the homosexual problem ,,,,,,, put all the queers on one island ,, and put all lesbians on another island far apart and in about 70 years no more queers or lesbians ,,,,,,,,,,

    • Libertarian Soldier

      They’ll start artificial insemination from felching.

    • Libertarian Soldier

      They’ll start artificial insemination from felching.

  • don

    Welcome to Sodom and Gohmorrah. Welcome to Hell.. That is where our nation is headed, if things don’t change. I really don’t think we will see a change to the good again. We have took many immoral people as leaders. Our nation will also be destroyed in the same manner as those Biblical cities. We need to get back to a spiritual nation or we will see the destruction of it in our generation… Pray for our nation and live in God’s will. Only then will God heal our land…

    • don

      sorry typing error. Too many immoral, not took…

  • Libertarian Soldier

    democrats that passed DOMA have forsaken the donkey for the sheep’s as*

  • Libertarian Soldier

    democrats that passed DOMA have forsaken the donkey for the sheep’s as*

DISGUSTING DEMOCRAT: This Lousy Liberal Just Wished Ebola on NRA Members
SECOND AMERICAN JOURNALIST BEHEADED: “I’m Back Obama”
WILLING TO PLEASE–Let People Know What You Want
MIDDLE CLASS SHRIVEL–Courtesy of Obama’s Policies
AFTER ALL THESE YEARS: Energy in America, Still a Problem
Load more