It all comes down to what it is that the logs show Dominion’s computers doing in the vote… so why is critical evidence being redacted?
The court in Michigan ordered an audit of the Dominion voting machines, and a bombshell report claiming significant issues just AFTER the vote certification process wrapped up made a lot of waves.
Now there’s another part of that story that didn’t come out with the first wave of news. It has to do with the evidence the courts did NOT give the public access to… and how that redacted information changes the whole political landscape.
If the claims of what’s concealed within those redacted portions is accurate, there is explicit evidence conclusively proving that the machines made real and meaningful changes to the vote which ultimately impacted the outcome.
An analyst whose company oversaw the audit of Dominion Voting Systems machines in Antrim County, Michigan is claiming that the redacted version of the forensic analysis of those machines obscured the allegedly conclusive revelations that the audit revealed.
Russell Ramsland Jr., a member of Allied Security Operations Group, said on Newsmax on Friday that the final report “show[ed] exactly what we did and exactly the findings.” Yet redactions in the report have covered up those conclusions, he argued.
…”The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings,” Ramsland told host Greg Kelly. “Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof,’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done’.”
“But at that point, Dominion’s argument is no longer with us,” he continued. “Dominion’s argument is with their own user’s manual and their own logs. Because the logs, had they been able to be published, show very clearly that the RCV [ranked-choice voting] algorithm was enacted. It shows very clearly that the error messages were massive. It shows very clearly that races were flipped.” –JustTheNews
If the evidence that races were flipped and that the ‘ranked choice voting algorithm’ was enacted, is true, that’s a big deal.
What will that mean? Simply put, there is no reason to have confidence in ANY vote that included the use of these machines.